Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!decvax!cca!mirror!misc!inmet!janw
From: janw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Time magazine
Message-ID: <117200137@inmet>
Date: Tue, 23-Sep-86 10:07:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.117200137
Posted: Tue Sep 23 10:07:00 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Oct-86 07:24:37 EDT
References: <390@vaxb.calgary.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:vaxb.calgary.UUCP:-39000:inmet:117200137:000:841
Nf-From: inmet.UUCP!janw    Sep 23 10:07:00 1986


>[tan@ihlpg.UUCP ]
>> So what are my alternatives?         Sue Brezden
>---
>I recommend the Economist (a British magazine).  It is probably
>too conservative for you, but it has a more thorough and more
>balanced news coverage than any other news magazine I have seen.

On the whole, yes; and  its  analysis  helps,  too,  whether  one
agrees or not (I often don't - too "wet" for me).
Of U.S. dailies, the WSJ is the most objective I've seen, and its
presentation is time-saving.
"Commentary" is a good monthly magazine of opinion (with a Jewish
slant, but of general interest); it's right-of-center.
"The New Republic" is a very decent liberal weekly. Excellent
U.S. political news coverage and analysis.

All these may be too sedate for an "aging hippie". A balanced
"Mother Jones" - "National Review" pair might work.

		Jan Wasilewsky