Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!cca!mirror!misc!inmet!nrh From: nrh@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc Subject: Re: Orphaned Response Message-ID: <117200232@inmet> Date: Thu, 9-Oct-86 19:49:00 EDT Article-I.D.: inmet.117200232 Posted: Thu Oct 9 19:49:00 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 16-Oct-86 06:30:55 EDT References: <705@qantel.UUCP> Lines: 28 Nf-ID: #R:qantel.UUCP:-70500:inmet:117200232:000:1598 Nf-From: inmet.UUCP!nrh Oct 9 19:49:00 1986 >/* Written 1:56 am Sep 29, 1986 by gabor@qantel.UUCP in inmet:talk.pol.misc */ >/* ---------- "Volunteers for a Clean Chernobyl" ---------- */ >No news (so far) about brand-new labor camps for the cleanup crews around >Chernobyl but there is this little item from the Party paper in Estonia: >it reported a spontaneous strike by hundreds of young Estonians conscripted >for decontamination of the Chernobyl area. The paper mentioned grueling >14-hour workdays in gas masks "with some falling sick from radiation exposure >and others anguished that they may return sterile to wives and fiancees". The >article talked about the brutality in the handling of the conscripts as they >washed down trees and dug up contaminated topsoil. [NY Times 8-31-86] > >These 18-year old Estonian kids are part of the roughly 1 million Soviet >construction troops, subject to Army discipline and treated even more >atrociously than the average Soviet conscript. They exist in part because >of traditional fondness for forced labor and in part to rough up / keep tabs >on non-conformists and unreliables. (Estonians are unreliable by definition.) >These construction troops are usually included in East-West force comparisons >even though they spend their years in uniform without ever being allowed near >weapons or live ammunition. > Gary Hart was proposing a similar idea (not, of course, including the brutality and radiation-exposure) He called it "National Service" and appeared to think it was one of his new ideas. I heard a radio editorial in favor of it on one of the Boston Radio stations.