Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!cca!mirror!misc!inmet!nrh
From: nrh@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <117200233@inmet>
Date: Thu, 9-Oct-86 19:53:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.117200233
Posted: Thu Oct  9 19:53:00 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 16-Oct-86 06:31:12 EDT
References: <720@nrcvax.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:nrcvax.UUCP:-72000:inmet:117200233:000:738
Nf-From: inmet.UUCP!nrh    Oct  9 19:53:00 1986


>/* Written  5:41 pm  Sep 24, 1986 by terry@nrcvax.UUCP in inmet:talk.pol.misc */
>/* ---------- "Re: Drug Abuse - True Problem or Me" ---------- */
>One small question here:  Some drugs taken often seem to make it
>virtually impossible for a person to hold a job.  It seems to me,
>therefore, that even if drugs were cheap, there would still be some
>stealing for drug money, because the addicted persons wouldn't be able
>to work.  (In case you didn't notice, I'm not talking about the casual
>user or the social user, but the hard-core, can't-live-without-it
>addict.)
>

One answer: you steal some hubcaps, or panhandle, and you get
enough money for a dose of (say) liquor.  It doesn't COST much, so you
don't STEAL much (too risky!)