Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!husc6!talcott!necntc!frog!tdh
From: tdh@frog.UUCP (T. Dave Hudson)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: the infamous income tax
Message-ID: <1078@frog.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-Oct-86 18:04:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: frog.1078
Posted: Mon Oct 13 18:04:15 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 16-Oct-86 20:36:55 EDT
References: <1074@frog.UUCP>
Distribution: talk
Organization: Superfrog Heaven [ CRDS, Framingham MA ]
Lines: 23

(The last few days we have had some trouble with our Usenet server.
Responses and/or email might have been lost.)

I was asked for an address for the book *The Law That Never Was*.  I
have seen it, and find it believable now on the basis of trust of some
particular individuals rather than on the basis of the unlikelihood of
self-deceptive errors in the handbill.  Here is (was?) the address of
the book's publishers:

 Constitutional Research Assoc.
 Box 550
 South Holland, Illinois 60473

I was also told that the ERA was rejected, in part, because of the
incorrectness of some of the ratifications.  Supposedly, it is a
political ploy to amend the text to be ratified, to show support for
the incorrect version without actually having to support a
Constitutional amendment.  (I didn't want that version of an ERA
passed, anyway, because of the vagueness in it that would allow, for
example, the idiotic notion of "comparable worth" to be legislated
or ajudicated.  But the point is the accepted unconstititutionality of
accepting deviations in the ratified text.)

				David Hudson