Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!husc6!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!ucla-cs!cc From: cc@locus.ucla.edu (Oleg "Kill the bastards" Kiselev) Newsgroups: talk.religion.misc Subject: Re: Too many things to choose one..... Message-ID: <2050@curly.ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Fri, 10-Oct-86 17:19:47 EDT Article-I.D.: curly.2050 Posted: Fri Oct 10 17:19:47 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 16-Oct-86 06:23:26 EDT References: <5507@decwrl.DEC.COM> <1609@tektools.UUCP> <2594@watdcsu.UUCP> <1857@curly.ucla-cs.ARPA> <15907@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: oleg%OACVAX.BITNET@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU (Oleg "Kill the bastards" Kiselev) Distribution: world Organization: Citizens' Committee to Stop Continental Drift Lines: 57 Keywords: It takes one to know one... Summary: Gene Ward Smith attempts to insult me... and actually succeeds! Why is it that whenever Gene posts I wish I hadf his scrawny neck in a vice and a hot poker ready to leave burn marks on his spotty hide?... Just a thought. In article <15907@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> gsmith@brahms.UUCP (Gene Ward Smith) writes: > Fine. Then why don't *you* stay in junk where you belong, or try to be >civil yourself? Your wretched hypocrisy is enough to make a hyena puke. "Hypocrisy" is a nasty word, Gene. Can you claim to be free of it? You have been keeping low profile in this news groups lately. I actually started changing my opinion of you based on your articles in soc.singles, but you woke me up from my delirium -- you are STILL a foul-mouthed, arrogant, self-rigteous egomaniac I remember from the past fights. > Fine. Why don't you abandon your libelous and unsubstantiated attacks >on all and sundry, and your patronizing and condescending attitude towards >everyone? (By the bye, what does an obscene little excrescence like ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Wow! That's the best insult to appear on the NET in many months! I am flatterd! It must have taken you these last few weeks of your relative abscence from the religion discussions to come up with that gem. I hope you did not get a headache from so much thinking -- an new and difficult task for you... >you *have* to be condescending about? I am rude and condescending, but ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I will agree with that. You DID forget pig-headed, numb-skulled, narrow minded, ovebearingly unpleasant.... Did I miss anything? Probably.... >at least I am educated and intelligent as well). While you are at it That, dear boy, is a matter of opinion. I find you lacking of education in most areas not directly related to your college major. Your ntelligence is also not really obvious: you are nasty and vicious, but that is not a sign of a great intellect. You DO have a very weak self-image and very fragile ego that need continual gratification through insulting others. To acheve the best effect, you have to make yourself feel superior to someone who threatens the miserable, pathetic little wimp in you -- I am honored to be viewed as such threat. >you might knock off the completely undisguised hatred and contempt for >Christians, the crypto-psychotic ranting and the continual barrage of >misguided zeal. OK? Good boy! I should ignore this statement. A refutation like "My best friends are Xtians" could serve as a nice bigoted reply, but I do not feel that is needed. I would welcome you to prove that YOU have shown tolerance and understanding in either this or other groups, but that would be an impossible task... Gene! You are in a dire need of psychiatric help. Please, do not use the NET as a surrogate shrink. See a real doctor. I really DO feel sorry for you! I am glad I can help by serving as a target for your flames. Who knows, may be oif it were not for the NET, me and a few others you rabidly attack, you might have been running through the streets of Berkeley, biting people and foaming at the mouth.... Oleg Kiselev, HASA "I am rude and condescending, at least I am educated and intelligent as well." -- G.W. Smith