Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!RELAY.CS.NET!JREECE%sc.intel.com
From: JREECE%sc.intel.com@RELAY.CS.NET
Newsgroups: mod.ai
Subject: Turbo Prolog - Yet Another Opinion
Message-ID: <8610060616.AA12837@ucbvax>
Date: Fri, 26-Sep-86 14:40:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8610060616.AA12837
Posted: Fri Sep 26 14:40:00 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 6-Oct-86 06:13:51 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 17
Approved: ailist@sri-stripe.arpa

Although Turbo Prolog has been characterized by some wags as a "brain-dead
implementation" I think its mixture of strengths and weaknesses would be more 
accurately described as those of an idiot savant.  Some of the extensions, 
such as the built-in string editor predicates, are positively serendipitous,
and you get most of the development time advantages of a fifth generation
language for a conventional application plus good runtime performance for 
only $70.  On the other hand, one tires quickly of writing NP-incomplete sets
of type declarations which are unnecessary in any other implementation....

If nothing else, for $70 you can prototype something that can be used to justify
spending $700 for a real PC Prolog compiler, or $18,000 for a VAX
implementation.    

John Reece
Intel