Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!nike!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!hplabsc!taylor From: taylor@hplabsc.UUCP (Dave Taylor) Newsgroups: mod.comp-soc Subject: Re: Performance Monitoring Message-ID: <710@hplabsc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 3-Oct-86 14:37:29 EDT Article-I.D.: hplabsc.710 Posted: Fri Oct 3 14:37:29 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Oct-86 07:24:46 EDT Reply-To: throopw@MCNC.CSNET Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Lines: 58 Approved: taylor@hplabs Reference: <681@hplabsc.UUCP> This article is from throopw%mcnc.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA and was received on Fri Oct 3 01:53:59 1986 > 1. Is this form of monitoring *ever* good? When? Why? Yes. When the monitee has reason to think that the monitor has the monitee's best interest at heart, as in when productivity measures of control groups rise as a result of monitoring alone. Because it creates empathy between the monitor and the monitee. > 2. Are there circumstances where this is *very* bad? When? Why? Yes. When the monitee has reason to think that the monitor has the monitee's worst interest at heart, as in cases where productivity drops off a sharp cliff under taskmaster administrations. Because it produces an adversary relationship. > 3. What level of monitoring should be performed? (this is obviously > relative to the task...) Depends on what the monitoring is to be used for. (Obviously, as you say.) > 4. Are *you* being monitored at all? Have you ever been? > If so, was it positive or negative, and how did you and your > fellow employees (and management) react to it?? Yes. Yes. My reaction is positive if I genuinely think it is "for my own good", bad if I think otherwise, and I would "think otherwise" if I am not informed of the monitoring beforehand. (Note that some such monitoring is implicitly expected. If you are told that you will be expected to run programs on a timeshareing system, you are often implicitly being told to expect accounting to be kept of your computer usage.) > 5. Finally, would information of this sort be viable information to > exchange on the "market"? (for example, an on-line search for all > programmers who take short lunches, type > 70 wpm and know how to > program in Fortran, by a placement agency). A subset of it? Do > you think this already takes place?? It would be viable. Subsets would also be viable. I doubt it takes place, but would not be surprised, but seriously doubt that it is widespread if it does take place. (NOTE: I said such information exchange would be "viable", not that I would approve of it. I would *NOT* approve of it, because it is an example of the naive perpetuation an archetypical computer risk, that of depending on overly simple computer-obscured models of reality.) In general, I rather think that monitoring-plus-carrots works much better than monitoring-plus-sticks if what you want done is to raise productivity. And covert monitoring is essentially *never* effective in the long term. -- "Duty now for the future." --- Devo