Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!ucbvax!XX.LCS.MIT.EDU!Lixia
From: Lixia@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU (Lixia Zhang)
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Why is the ARPANet in such bad shape these days?
Message-ID: <12242851943.62.LIXIA@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 29-Sep-86 14:34:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: XX.12242851943.62.LIXIA
Posted: Mon Sep 29 14:34:19 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 1-Oct-86 05:02:11 EDT
References: <8609291805.AA09813@devvax.tn.cornell.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 12
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa

Scott,

As far as I know, the numbers in my message were from measurements (by BBN)
on the pure forwarding gateways, NOT including hosts.

Lixia

P.S. Also talking about degenerative congestion -- if no one uses the net,
surely no congestion would exist, probably nor would the net itself.
With no congestion, people still send mail daily, though probably on
different subjects.
-------