Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!decvax!ucbvax!ZERMATT.LCS.MIT.EDU!james
From: james@ZERMATT.LCS.MIT.EDU ("James William O'Toole, Jr.")
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Peace fullness.
Message-ID: <860930145053.3.JAMES@GREEN-GRASS.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 30-Sep-86 14:50:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: GREEN-GR.860930145053.3.JAMES
Posted: Tue Sep 30 14:50:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Oct-86 05:33:50 EDT
References: <8609291748.AA13652@hydra.riacs.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 26
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa


    From: leiner@riacs.edu
    Date: Mon, 29 Sep 86 10:48:13 -0700
    To: <BEAME%MCMASTER.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu>
    Cc: tcp-ip@sri-nic.ARPA
    Subject: Re: Peace fullness. 

    Carl,

    The theory is that products developed in the R&D community (read
    universities) are not supported adequately for industry to rely on.
    Hence the commercial market is for an equally functional product that
    is maintained, evolved, supported, etc.

    It appears from your note that you don't buy that argument.  I would be
    interested in your reaction.

---------

Would anyone mind moving the discussions of commercial vs. university
product requirements to a more appropriate list, and off of tcp-ip?

Thanks.

  --Jim