Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cuae2!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy)
Newsgroups: net.cycle
Subject: Re: Daytime high vs low beam
Message-ID: <1267@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 22-Oct-86 13:55:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: ttrdc.1267
Posted: Wed Oct 22 13:55:44 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Oct-86 07:33:10 EDT
References: <131@ccicpg.UUCP> <30.UUL1.1#119@mp-mojo.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL
Lines: 21

In article <30.UUL1.1#119@mp-mojo.UUCP>, mojo@mp-mojo.UUCP (Mojo Jones) writes:
>There was one other pragmatic argument that he presented:  If you're
>going to wear out and blow a bulb filament, better to blow the high
>beam than the low.
>
>Also, nifty trick if you *do* blow both filaments and have to get
>home or somewhere:  Take the cover off the front left (or right)
>turn signal, and pull the bulb from the left (or right) rear signal
>so the flasher won't work.  Clever.

??? Why disable the flasher when the headlamp has burned out ???

>Mojo
-- 
 -------------------------------    Disclaimer:  The views contained herein are
|       dan levy | yvel nad      |  my own and are not at all those of my em-
|         an engihacker @        |  ployer or the administrator of any computer
| at&t computer systems division |  upon which I may hack.
|        skokie, illinois        |
 --------------------------------   Path: ..!{akgua,homxb,ihnp4,ltuxa,mvuxa,
	   go for it!  			allegra,ulysses,vax135}!ttrdc!levy