Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!nike!oliveb!epimass!jbuck
From: jbuck@epimass.UUCP (Joe Buck)
Newsgroups: net.eunice
Subject: Re: uucp & eunice
Message-ID: <589@epimass.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Nov-86 14:25:59 EST
Article-I.D.: epimass.589
Posted: Sat Nov  1 14:25:59 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 3-Nov-86 23:30:27 EST
References: <371@cti.cti.UUCP> <421@uwmacc.UUCP> <2092@homxb.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbuck@epimass.UUCP (Joe Buck)
Organization: Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, CA
Lines: 25

In article <2092@homxb.UUCP> ceh@homxb.UUCP (C.HAILEY) writes:
>	One footnote: Eunice 4.2 on a VAX outperforms Berkley 4.2!

You must be joking.  Try "ls -l" on a large directory, and take a long
coffee break on Eunice (of course, this isn't nearly as bad as it was
under Eunice 3.x with lots of hashnamed files in the directory).  Or try
doing a task with lots of forks and execs.  It takes VMS tens or even
hundreds of times as long as Unix to read a directory or create a new
process.  

If you're talking about number-crunching though, the time should be
exactly the same as for 4.1bsd, since the same C compiler (essentially) is
used and you're running the same machine instructions.  

>	Yes!  Eunice is an odd world, I wish there was more info in
>	this group.

Since news 2.11 will run on Eunice, maybe that will increase this group's
traffic a bit (Chip Rosenthal at Intel got 2.10.2 news to run on Eunice v3.2,
but his code was never widely distributed).  


-- 
- Joe Buck 	{hplabs,ihnp4}!oliveb!epimass!jbuck
  Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, California