Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!00R0DHESI%bsu.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
From: 00R0DHESI%bsu.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Expression sequencing query
Message-ID: <4642@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 16-Oct-86 00:48:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.4642
Posted: Thu Oct 16 00:48:58 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 21-Oct-86 21:49:42 EDT
Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA
Lines: 20

Peter S. Shenkin <cubsvax!peters@columbia.ARPA> writes:
<In article <umcp-cs.3769> chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
<<	result = a + b;
<<	result += c;
<...
<...I wish there were some way of forcing order of execution, to 
<this extent anyway, within a line.

Try this:
     {int t = a + b; result = t + c;}  /* note:  force evaluation order */

This construct is general and it achieves the purpose.  The extra variable
exists only in the block and doesn't clutter up the rest of the program.  And 
its very presence shouts "Careful!" to next person who modifies the code.  
C doesn't cry wolf.  Other languages do. 


                                Rahul Dhesi <dhesi%bsu@csnet-relay.ARPA>
                                !seismo!csnet-relay.ARPA!bsu!dhesi
                                Yes, I know they go the wrong way.