Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!reed!omssw2!martin
From: martin@omssw2.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: sbrk() and brk()
Message-ID: <510@omssw2.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 22-Oct-86 14:34:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: omssw2.510
Posted: Wed Oct 22 14:34:36 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Oct-86 18:49:30 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Intel Corp., OMS Div., Systems Group, Hillsboro, OR
Lines: 15

In regards to your posting about finding problems with the way that
Xenix performs it's sbrk and brk, I have this to say...

Xenix 5.0 from microsoft is only Unix 5.0 compatible.  They do not
guarantee 100% compatibility.  It is not a validated port.
So the way that they implement these routines is up to them.
-- 
<==============================================

martin wilde
omssw2!martin

Of course the usual disclaimer applies.

===============================================>