Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!qantel!ptsfa!hoptoad!gnu
From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Must casting destroy lvalueness?
Message-ID: <1244@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Wed, 29-Oct-86 00:41:23 EST
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.1244
Posted: Wed Oct 29 00:41:23 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Oct-86 22:34:51 EST
References: <4617@brl-smoke.ARPA> <657@dg_rtp.UUCP> <61@cartan.Berkeley.EDU>
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 16

One interesting thing for people who don't understand this issue to do is
to ask yourself what the compiler should do for a construct like:

	int i = 17;
	((double)i)++;

Again, don't post your favorite answer to the net.  Just think about it.

PS:  When you're done that one, try:

	double i = 17;
	((int)i)++;
-- 
John Gilmore  {sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,ihnp4}!hoptoad!gnu   jgilmore@lll-crg.arpa
  Overheard at a funeral: "I know this may be an awkward time, but do
  you recall him ever mentioning source code?"		-- Charles Addams