Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!caip!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!tikal!hplsla!jamesv
From: jamesv@hplsla.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm
Subject: Re: Info needed: Skyles 1541 Flash!
Message-ID: <6300008@hplsla.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 27-Oct-86 23:46:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hplsla.6300008
Posted: Mon Oct 27 23:46:00 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 28-Oct-86 21:07:58 EST
References: <946@cavell.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:cavell:-94600:hplsla:6300008:000:525
Nf-From: hplsla!jamesv    Oct 27 21:46:00 1986


> I believe the length of cable that the Flash! product supplies is critical.
> The length of cable must have been worked into an equation that times the
> arrival of bits from the drive. I have lost the original cable due to cutting.
> 
> Scott McPhee 
 
Scott,
I don't own a Flash! but I'd be VERY surprised if the cable length affects
the timing in this circuit (but I've been surprised before).  Have you
carefully checked your new cable for intermittent short or open circuits?

Best of luck finding the solution.
James