Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!rutgers!caip!clyde!cuae2!ihnp4!ihlpa!gadfly From: gadfly@ihlpa.UUCP Newsgroups: net.misc Subject: Re: Poor People/Lazy People Message-ID: <2066@ihlpa.UUCP> Date: Thu, 16-Oct-86 10:27:11 EDT Article-I.D.: ihlpa.2066 Posted: Thu Oct 16 10:27:11 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Oct-86 07:20:51 EDT References: <1010@cad.cs.cmu.edu> <1050001@hpspkla.HP.COM> Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 34 -- > > *My* ethical system that demands "this obligation"? You say this as if > > it had to be some bizarre cultist dogma. I'm a Jew, and my religion > > specifies 613 obligations in some detail... > > > > ken perlow ***** ***** > > 1. You are attempting impose your moral and religous code on everyone > else. How would you like it if the majority religious belief system was > imposed on you? (There is historical precedent, alas.) > > 2. By your own admission, "I do not even try to fulfill most of these > obligations" yet you are quite willing to require everyone else to obey > SOME of the obligations you feel compelled to obey. Can you say "Hypocrite?" > But of course, you believe in the welfare state -- you don't have to be > intellectually honest. > > Clayton E. Cramer Oh, poppycock, Clayton. I was responding to a question about where my own personal beliefs came from. I never maintained that it was a system anybody else should follow. Indeed, Judaism finds proselytizing offensive. But the point, guy, is that if a person has any morals at all--deontological, utilitarian, whatever--no matter how you cut it, selfishness comes out at best amoral. And so, your vacuous, pointy-headed accusations of "hypocrisy" and "welfare-statism" are just self-righteous attempts to bait me. They worked, though. *** *** JE MAINTIENDRAI ***** ***** ****** ****** 16 Oct 86 [25 Vendemiaire An CXCV] ken perlow ***** ***** (312)979-8042 ** ** ** ** ihnp4!ihlpa!gadfly *** *** <== NOTE NEW ADDRESS!