Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!ucla-cs!cc1 From: cc1@locus.ucla.edu (Michael Gersten) Newsgroups: net.news Subject: Re: How to Defeat the Backbone Cabal in your Spare Time Message-ID: <2228@curly.ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Tue, 21-Oct-86 04:03:55 EDT Article-I.D.: curly.2228 Posted: Tue Oct 21 04:03:55 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Oct-86 22:30:30 EDT References: <2633@garfield.UUCP> <2129@curly.ucla-cs.ARPA> <2762@garfield.UUCP> Reply-To: occ4mgk@oac.ucla.edu, cc1@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU (Michael Gersten) Distribution: world Organization: Ucla Computer Club (disclaimer) Lines: 46 Summary: Hidden costs You really think we should charge the users for posting? Ok, I'll save my money and not post any sources or bianaries. Seriously, this is the very area where pure capitalism breaks down: hidden costs. If the immediate cost is higher than the immediate value, you don't do something. No individual in his right mind would pay for defense if it was optional, since the money could be put to better use elsewhere. Etc. Dito for education ("If you think education is expensive, try ignorance"). This is why we have a government, and why we have a fair amount (too much?) welfare. Now, you want to charge the individual users/sites. OK, so no user will post things like sources, since they don't pay back the cost. Result? Charge the site. But the site doesn't earn anything, so they won't allow it. Where does it end? One possibility: charge the reader. The problem is: how? The cost to the site is inpedendent of # of readers, so the cost would vary based on how many people read. Or you could charge an average amount on a per newsgroup basis. This might actually work; however, it discriminates against users at small institutions in favor of large (economies of scale). There is also the problem that not everyone has access to a large institution that lets them read news. Yes, I know its a privilege, but if we start charging, then users attitudes might start changing. They might regard it as another compuserve, and consider their use in a similar maner (i.e. What do you mean I can't use it? I can pay, right?) I actually got the news source (2.10.3 beta), and found that you can prohibit specific users...nice. So I was wrong about that. And as for the $50-$150, if you listen to the horror stories that float out from (apparently) the backbone, that is what the average site should be paying to distribute the news. I didn't say we would post $50 worth of news--but if we had to pay for phone costs to receive 1.5 meg a day (even if we only get around .5 meg a day by restricting news groups), that adds up. Remember: the cost to a node isn't related to how much is posted by that node. Total volume is. Michael Gersten p.s. Why does inews core dump on sys3 Xenix? Anyone gotten it to work on such a beast? (in insert(), while getting the date, environ gets trashed) Views expressed here may not be those of the Computer Club, UCLA, or anyone in their left OR right mind. And that's the name o' that tune.