Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-crg!seismo!rpics!brspyr1!tim
From: tim@brspyr1.UUCP (Tim Northrup)
Newsgroups: net.news.config,net.news.adm
Subject: Re: UUCP Map Update for site 'brspyr1'
Message-ID: <97@brspyr1.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-Oct-86 00:58:52 EST
Article-I.D.: brspyr1.97
Posted: Fri Oct 24 00:58:52 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Oct-86 01:51:00 EST
References: <95@brspyr1.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: BRS Information Technologies, Latham NY
Lines: 37
Xref: watmath net.news.config:1022 net.news.adm:1001

In article <95@brspyr1.UUCP> tim@brspyr1.UUCP (Tim Northrup) writes:
> This should bring us up to the present :-)
> 
> #N	brspyr1
> #S	Pyramid 90x; OSx 3.1
> ...
> #
> #	UUCP Connectivity Data for "brspyr1"
> #
> brspyr1	.brs.com
> brspyr1	rpics(DAILY/4), dartvax(DEMAND+HIGH), pyrbos(DEMAND+HIGH),
> 	brsug(DIRECT), brscci(DIRECT)

After  posting  this  to  net.news.config,  I wonder if it is the proper
newsgroup.  In looking through the most recent newsgroups file, I cannot
see any group which claims to accept  uucp  map  UPDATES,  only  mod.map
which I assume is only for full map distributions.

Has  any collective thought been given to a net.map.update newsgroup, or
should updates to the UUCP map only be  mailed  to  uucpmap@cbosgd,  and
wait  for  them  to disseminate the information (i.e., not posted to the
net)?  In thinking about it, I would agree that if everyone were to post
every little modification to their entry, the net would be flooded,  but
I think a policy on this should be stated.

If this has been covered elsewhere, sorry to be a bother.
-- 

 Tim Northrup		(518) 783-1161

 BRS Information Technologies			...!ihnp4!dartvax!brspyr1!tim
 1200 Route 7					...!seismo!rpics!brspyr1!tim
 Latham, NY  12110				tim@brspyr1.UUCP

======== INSERT STANDARD DISCLAIMER FORM 43Z892-BXY/86.3 HERE =============

"It's good to be the king!"