Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!rochester!ken
From: ken@rochester.ARPA (Comfy chair)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.periphs
Subject: Re: an idea for higher capacity disks
Message-ID: <22218@rochester.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 6-Nov-86 21:39:55 EST
Article-I.D.: rocheste.22218
Posted: Thu Nov  6 21:39:55 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Nov-86 23:37:53 EST
References: <1256@hoptoad.uucp> <273@csustan.UUCP>
Reply-To: ken@rochester.UUCP (Comfy chair)
Organization: U of Rochester, CS Dept, Rochester, NY
Lines: 8
Xref: watmath net.arch:4197 net.periphs:1281
Summary: but you *have* to write faster anyway

Wait a minute. If we are talking about constant angular velocity (CAV)
disks, then the surface moves faster under the head on the outer
tracks.  Then to fit more sectors in you'd have to write the bits
faster, so you would still have to change the clock rate.

Am I missing something here?

	Ken