Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!umcp-cs!chris
From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: RAxx disk partitons
Message-ID: <3925@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 18-Oct-86 03:10:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3925
Posted: Sat Oct 18 03:10:03 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Oct-86 23:25:51 EDT
References: <4539@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Organization: University of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Sci.
Lines: 15

In article <4539@brl-smoke.ARPA> conley%ukans.csnet@RELAY.CS.NET
(Dennis R. Conley) writes:
>Once again, I am compelled to ponder the rationale behind the choice
>of partition sizes for RA disks ( in particular, those for ra81's in
>4.3 ).

`Rationale'?  You mean there is one?

(There is a tiny bit of merit in making the `a' partition the same
size as most other `a' partitions.  But we threw out the `standard'
tables long ago.)
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 1516)
UUCP:	seismo!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet:	chris@umcp-cs		ARPA:	chris@mimsy.umd.edu