Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!hplabsb!bl From: bl@hplabsb.UUCP (Bruce T. Lowerre) Newsgroups: sci.med Subject: Re: Activated charcoal Message-ID: <3792@hplabsb.UUCP> Date: Fri, 7-Nov-86 14:01:01 EST Article-I.D.: hplabsb.3792 Posted: Fri Nov 7 14:01:01 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Nov-86 06:56:47 EST References: <541@sfsup.UUCP> <528@aecom.UUCP> <601@hadron.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Lines: 7 Summary: adsorb vs absorb In article <601@hadron.UUCP>, jsdy@hadron.UUCP (Joseph S. D. Yao) writes: > > Activated charcoal is pretty general -- it will absorb just about ^^^^^^ > any molecule within a certain range. I believe the word should be "adsorb".