Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!rutgers!clyde!cuae2!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) Newsgroups: sci.med Subject: Re: Calcium deposits (question) Message-ID: <1306@ttrdc.UUCP> Date: Sun, 9-Nov-86 16:51:22 EST Article-I.D.: ttrdc.1306 Posted: Sun Nov 9 16:51:22 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Nov-86 00:02:05 EST References: <3573@columbia.UUCP> <4271@ut-ngp.UUCP> Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL Lines: 28 In article <4271@ut-ngp.UUCP>, osmigo1@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ron Morgan) writes: >>Anyway, the osteopath now believes it's a calcium deposit, and is >>discussing treatment first with anti-inflammatory medicine and, if that >>doesn't work, with cortisone shots. >>Lee Woodbury >Let me say first off that I am VERY picky about who I let work on my joints. >Injections, etc. are made into the sac enclosing the joint, and the slightest >infection can result in *amputating* the limb. I've seen it happen. I thought that kind of thing happened mainly back in the time before anti- biotics (but that was also the time before cortisone shots, too, wasn't it?). Is it still common? It seems to me that getting a cut on one's finger could also result in losing one's arm, but that the chances would be slim. What happens in these cases? Why do antibiotics fail to work in these cases of the "slightest infection"? >the *slightest* indication of less-than-perfect competence on the part of my >osteopath, I'm getting out of there FAST. I don't know exactly what your >friend's osteopath told her, but I find it pretty scary. >R.A. Morgan -- ------------------------------- Disclaimer: The views contained herein are | dan levy | yvel nad | my own and are not at all those of my em- | an engihacker @ | ployer or the administrator of any computer | at&t computer systems division | upon which I may hack. | skokie, illinois | -------------------------------- Path: ..!{akgua,homxb,ihnp4,ltuxa,mvuxa, go for it! allegra,ulysses,vax135}!ttrdc!levy