Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsri!sask!alberta!ncc!lyndon From: lyndon@ncc.UUCP (Lyndon Nerenberg) Newsgroups: can.general Subject: Re: stubby beer bottles Message-ID: <765@ncc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Nov-86 23:43:24 EST Article-I.D.: ncc.765 Posted: Fri Nov 14 23:43:24 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 17-Nov-86 00:43:22 EST References: <12157@watnot.UUCP> <1986Nov6.132544.12556@utcs.uucp> <248@winston.UUCP> Sender: news@ncc.UUCP Distribution: can Organization: Nexus Computing Corp., Edmonton, AB Lines: 36 In article <248@winston.UUCP>, veerman@winston.UUCP (Maarten Veerman) writes: > In article <290@ubc-vision.UUCP> majka@ubc-vision.UUCP (Marc Majka) writes: > > The point is that the GQ type beer snob DOES exist, and it is this type of > person that the marketing types in the breweries are thinking about when > they sell 'Fosters' or 'Coors' or 'Budweiser' that is brewed in Canada. The funny thing is, if they were lousy beers, nobody would buy them, therefore there would not be a reason for the Canadian breweries to market them... Thank god we have alternatives to Andres wines! > nonstandard green or long-neck bottles. ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ Don't know about you, but I haven't seen a *standard* stubby in MANY months... > BTW anyone who has been to Oz will tell you that Fosters doesn't hold a > candle to Swan Lager (from W.A.) or even Tooheys (from N.S.W.). And anybody who has been to Canada will tell you Blue doesn't hold a candle to Fosters (all right, I'm a bit biased!) > Food for thought: All Canadian beer contains a small amount of fromaldehide I might be wrong, but I thought Sodium MetaBisulphite was the only "approved" preservative (?) > Any votes out there for a law calling for contents to be printed on the > label, just like most other foods? Will you be able to read the fine print after five bottles??? -- Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM) Systems Group - A Div. of Nexus Computing Corp. UUCP: {ihnp4,ubc-vision,watmath}!alberta!ncc!lyndon BITNET: USERCHNL@UALTAMTS