Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!adm!sjk%grape.ads.arpa@BRL.ARPA
From: sjk%grape.ads.arpa@BRL.ARPA (Scott J. Kramer)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: rmail-reply-to-sender
Message-ID: <855@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 17-Nov-86 16:45:27 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-adm.855
Posted: Mon Nov 17 16:45:27 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 17-Nov-86 22:05:43 EST
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 16

Speaking of mail replies, there's an annoyance related to using a
REPLY-TO field, which I currently use because the host I'm sending
from isn't recognized on the Internet.

When the recipient responds to a message with a REPLY-TO which also
has CC addresses, the CC's are omitted in the reply; only the REPLY-TO
address is used.  RFC822 isn't specific about this; it just says "if
REPLY-TO exists, then the reply should go to the addresses indicated
in that field and not to the address(es) indicated in the FROM field."

I'm CC'ing Header-People on this since someone there may know of a way
to do what I'm trying to do (ie, have CC's get replies if I use
REPLY-TO).  From what I can tell, the only way is to have a valid FROM
field.

scott