Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!cbatt!cbosgd!mark From: mark@cbosgd.ATT.COM (Mark Horton) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: mod.map problems and directions Message-ID: <3129@cbosgd.ATT.COM> Date: Tue, 2-Dec-86 12:23:34 EST Article-I.D.: cbosgd.3129 Posted: Tue Dec 2 12:23:34 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Dec-86 20:48:57 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, Oh Lines: 45 There were a few hiccups in the mod.map posting this month. There was an empty file posted with subject UUCP map for d.u[a-l]* due to a shell script typo. The d.* files were also posted twice, once with a long subject line which causes problems for a few systems. The 2nd and 3rd batches did not go out on schedule, and are being sent out currently - these batches have the AT&T maps for nj and il. Finally, the 7th batch did not go out, due to a crontab problem. It went out yesterday. Anyway, when u.usa.il.a.? arrives on your machines (it will leave cbosgd tonight, Dec 2) you will have the complete map. You can safely discard the d.u[a-z]* posting, and you should also probably discard u.Path.? since those files have been replaced. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. The problems have been corrected and should not affect next month's posting. Next month's posting will adopt a minor change; we will no longer post duplicate information in both the d.* and u.* files. For domains that are registered and appear in d.*, we will delete their information from the u.* file. If you have information in only your u.* that you want to continue to send out, it should go into your d.* file. One side-effect of this is that the special files for AT&T and Bellcore *.a.* and *.b.* will no longer be distributed; if you want records of them, save this month's postings somewhere. Note that we want to keep the d.* files small. As such, we only want to know about your domain gateways. There is no need to list the contact information for all your internal machines; we can go through the domain contact if necessary. Similarly, domain mail can be delivered through your gateways; there is no need for information about internal machines or subdomains. Thus, large companies like AT&T, Tektronix, and HP should be planning for the elimination of their huge lists of UUCP machines in the u.* files and replacement by a small domain entry in the d.* file. We do intend to offer a "we reserve these UUCP names" service, by listing ONLY the UUCP names in the d. entry, for example: ATT-NAC = {ihnp4, cbosgd, ... } cbosgd: ATT-NAC(DIRECT) which reserves the name and ensures that all such hosts are reachable. If you need assistance in setting this up (or would like input into the process) please let us know. Mark Horton Director, The UUCP Project