Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!decwrl!decvax!wanginst!ulowell!page From: page@ulowell.UUCP (Bob Page) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: 1.2 resident query Message-ID: <760@ulowell.UUCP> Date: Mon, 17-Nov-86 16:41:52 EST Article-I.D.: ulowell.760 Posted: Mon Nov 17 16:41:52 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Nov-86 08:46:52 EST References: <1017@husc2.UUCP> <1607@amiga.amiga.UUCP> Reply-To: page@ulowell.UUCP (Bob Page) Organization: University of Lowell Lines: 35 andy@skipper.UUCP (andy finkel) wrote in article <1607@amiga.amiga.UUCP>: >The resident command allowed a reentrant, sharable program to use kept ^^^^ note the tense here >in memory, and not reloaded for multiple invocations. Unfortunately, >as it turns out, this seemed only to apply to many BCPL programs. It didn't even work correctly for BCPL programs! Sure, it worked somewhat, but the Resident command allocated more space than it should have - including a data segment that should be allocated on startup, not when the program was installed as resident. >And there was no way to check whether a program was residentable or not This is a truly great word, Andy. ^^^^^^^^^ >Some more thought is going to have to be put into the concept >before it sees the light of day again. Even a _little_ more thought would have been nice ... like checksumming the segments to see if they had changed - if so, allocate space for new ones - in other words, take what you can and replace the dirty segments from the disk. I'm not flaming you guys, I'm flaming MCC. Hey, speaking of the Toolkit (well, you did but I trimmed out that part), what can you say about the program to allow overscanning? It's mentioned in the 1.2 release notes (poof) but the gamma 1 toolkit doesn't have it and the 1.2 release toolkit isn't out yet. > andy finkel > Commodore(Amiga) Are you still in Los Gatos or have you returned to West Chester? ..Bob -- Bob Page, U of Lowell CS Dept. ulowell!page, page@ulowell.CSNET