Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!well!perry From: perry@well.UUCP (Perry S. Kivolowitz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: C-Ltd. (Disk Controllers Really) Message-ID: <2077@well.UUCP> Date: Thu, 20-Nov-86 23:40:51 EST Article-I.D.: well.2077 Posted: Thu Nov 20 23:40:51 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 21-Nov-86 05:19:03 EST References: <2043@well.UUCP> <758@ulowell.UUCP> <1986Nov19.104846.321@utcs.uucp> Organization: Whole Earth Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA Lines: 33 Summary: DMA VS Non-DMA Disk Controllers In article <1986Nov19.104846.321@utcs.uucp>, wagner@utcs.uucp (Michael Wagner) writes: > Bob Page suggested, in his article, that Amiga software would prevent a > DMA hard disk from performing well. I don't understand this. Did I mis-interpret > his statement? Or can someone fill me in on this? The jist of what Bob Page said (that DMA and Non-DMA disk controllers will perform at roughly the same speed) is correct. The speed at which a disk controller can squirt a block to/from the amiga is not the bottleneck. Witness brand X whose controller is capable of squirts to/from the Amiga at 300KB/sec (DMA). Compare this with brand Y whose controller does not transfer via DMA and is capable of only 100KB peak xfer rate. Which will run faster? Who knows...it depends on disk layout. Why? Because the throughput through the AmigaDOS file system is low enough that neither controller will run at full speed (ie brand X will never get to really take advantage of the 300KB/sec since disk i/o time is dominated by seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeking). You may say: But this happens on many systems. You'd be right too. But most other file system formats do not get as scattered as AmigaDOS can become after similar interactive useage. What about super high performance controllers then? Those wanting to design THE high performance disk controller for the amiga will have to look elsewhere for their performance boosts. We (ASDG) are. Perry ----------- The above reflects my personal opinion and is the result of my own invest- igations.