Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!ptsfa!pttesac!vanam
From: vanam@pttesac.UUCP (Marnix van Ammers)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Spelling of kernel
Message-ID: <347@pttesac.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 31-Dec-69 18:59:59 EST
Article-I.D.: pttesac.347
Posted: Wed Dec 31 18:59:59 1969
Date-Received: Sun, 7-Dec-86 04:45:05 EST
References: <8611191016.AA19776@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <1074@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> <1028@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <182@ico.UUCP> <1059@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Reply-To: vanam@pttesac.UUCP (Marnix van Ammers)
Organization: Pacific*Bell ESAC, San Francisco
Lines: 18

In article <1059@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> carolyn@cbmvax.UUCP (Carolyn Scheppner) writes:
>hope you don't care how I spell it.  I know that I have confused
>our 8-bit "Kernal" with our Amiga "Kernel" on occasion.  I worked

*Your* 8-bit "Kernal" ?

I'm not sure, but from all the postings on this subject I *think*
that what has happened is that Commodore mispelled "kernel" in
some documentation for the C-64 and that the mispelling has since
become accepted within Commodore and within the C-64 user community.

Is that it?

Marnix
-- 
Marnix A.  van\ Ammers		Work: (415) 545-8334
Home: (707) 644-9781		CEO: MAVANAMMERS:UNIX
{ihnp4|ptsfa}!pttesac!vanam	CIS: 70027,70