Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!sun!cmcmanis
From: cmcmanis@sun.uucp (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: C-compilers for Amiga are Terrible (was Re: Audio Interrupt vector)
Message-ID: <10253@sun.uucp>
Date: Tue, 9-Dec-86 13:24:46 EST
Article-I.D.: sun.10253
Posted: Tue Dec  9 13:24:46 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Dec-86 04:20:34 EST
References: <8611191016.AA19776@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <1074@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> <245@sbcs.UUCP>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 18

In article <245@sbcs.UUCP>, root@sbcs.UUCP (Root) writes:
 >            ...  If memory serves, I believe I read somewhere that Amiga
 > does their development using the (expensive) GreenHills compiler system
 > that also runs on a SUN.  Why suffer the slings and arrows of Manx, 
 > Lattice, etc if you have access to a Sun workstation??
 > 
 > 						Rick Spanbauer

Well, for one thing my Amiga is at home and my Sun Workstation is at
work. (Which would really cut into the compile/test time) And second because
obviously Sun doesn't pay me to do Amiga programs, when I use this
50K workstation I try to maximize the benefit to my employer. Now if 
I could buy a Workstation for use at home, why would I want an Amiga? 

-- 
--Chuck McManis
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.