Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!ucbvax!jade!eris!chapman
From: chapman@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Brent Chapman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Future Amigas & suggestions
Message-ID: <1666@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Sat, 15-Nov-86 17:54:22 EST
Article-I.D.: jade.1666
Posted: Sat Nov 15 17:54:22 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Nov-86 20:03:49 EST
References: <320@plx.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: chapman@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Brent Chapman)
Distribution: net
Organization: UNIXversity of California at Berkeley
Lines: 28

In article <320@plx.UUCP> ed@plx.UUCP (Ed Chaban) writes:

	[ Various religious arguments against the Amiga and Commodore.]

>Ed Chaban (former AMIGA owner!)
>Net: sun!plx!ed

If you're a _FORMER_ Amiga owner, and you were so dissatisfied with the
machine, why are you still hanging around comp.sys.amiga?  Just to give
the rest of us a hard time because we happen to disagree with you, and
think it is a wonderful machine?  That's what it seems like.

You made a mistake choosing a machine, apparently.  Fine, you got rid of
the machine.  All well and good.  But WHY do you insist on giving the rest
of us, who _don't_ think we've made a mistake, a hard time?!?

Go away!  This is supposed to be a forum for useful information about the
Amiga, not for religious arguments by someone who feels, rightly or wrongly,
that he's been wronged by the machine or by the company behind it!


Brent Chapman (current VERY SATISFIED Amiga owner!)

chapman@eris.berkeley.edu	or	ucbvax!eris!chapman
--
Brent Chapman

chapman@eris.berkeley.edu	or	ucbvax!eris!chapman