Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!ttidca!paulb From: paulb@ttidca.UUCP (Paul Blumstein) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: //C Message-ID: <201@ttidca.UUCP> Date: Wed, 5-Nov-86 12:39:50 EST Article-I.D.: ttidca.201 Posted: Wed Nov 5 12:39:50 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Nov-86 00:52:16 EST References: <6129@decwrl.DEC.COM> Reply-To: paulb@ttidca.UUCP (Paul Blumstein) Organization: Shoes for Industry Lines: 29 In article <6129@decwrl.DEC.COM> craparotta@tipple.dec.com (Joe Crap) writes: >From what I understand the //E still outsells [and outsold] the //C... > >Joe According to the latest Infoworld, the //e & //c each have 8% of the PC market. Therefore sales are about equal. BTW, the Mac leads the PC market w/12% market share. However, the graph was on individual PC models. For example, if you add up both Apples, it would surpass the Mac. Or if you add up all three IBM PCs, it will also surpass it. I remember when the //c first came out. Apple expected the large majority of sales to be //c instead of //e. They drastically cut //e production & made tons of //c's. Right from the start the sales were 50/50. We buyers of iie's at the time had a hard time finding them to buy. Apple had to scramble to correct the situation. I suspect the miscalculation came from Steve Jobs who had this strange notion about people preferring closed architectures. It will be interesting to see how the Apple pie (pun intended) is divided between //c, //e & //GS once the latter becomes readily availble. Maybe I should have thrown Mac onto the list as I suspect that it will cut into both Mac & //e sales (but not //c) once //GS specific software is available. ============================================================================= Paul Blumstein | There's no point in being grown up if you can't Citicorp/TTI | be childish sometimes. -- Dr. Who Santa Monica, CA 90405 +------------------------------------------------- (213) 450-9111 {philabs,trwrb,vortex}!ttidca!paulb