Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!rutgers!clyde!cuae2!gatech!gitpyr!jkg From: jkg@gitpyr.gatech.EDU (Jim Greenlee) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att Subject: Re: Re: Hard Disk for PC-6300 Message-ID: <2680@gitpyr.gatech.EDU> Date: Thu, 20-Nov-86 11:21:17 EST Article-I.D.: gitpyr.2680 Posted: Thu Nov 20 11:21:17 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 21-Nov-86 05:20:39 EST References: <8519PAX@PSUVMA> <119@hqda-ai.UUCP> <1504@ihlpl.UUCP> <459@ll1.UUCP> Reply-To: jkg@gitpyr.UUCP (Jim Greenlee) Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology Lines: 66 In article <459@ll1.UUCP> cej@ll1.UUCP (One of the Jones Boys) writes: >- Most personal computers I am familiar with have a utility for >- parking the disk heads, but the documentation generally indicates >- that the heads only need to be parked if the computer is going to >- be moved. > > The documentation does seem to be correct, and is in >agreement with all documentation I have ever seen for winchester >drives that don't auto-park. > > At one time I supported (installed/maintained) over 50 AT&T >6300s and IBM-PCs for a period of about a year and a half, and none >of the drives were ever parked except to be moved. And in that >time, other than infant mortality, we had only one failure of a >drive that was related to the media or heads. So you can feel quite >safe following the documentation. This time... :-) When I purchased my PC 6300, I was specifically told NOT to park the heads with the DOS 3.1 "SHIP" utility. The salesman claimed that it would cause problems, but did not elaborate. Any reason why I would have been given this advice? (the drive is an ST-235, I believe). Jim Greenlee { What follows are blank lines so our stinking news system will take this article (something about including more lines than new lines) Please hit "n", or whatever, now } -- The Shadow...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!jkg Jryy, abj lbh'ir tbar naq qbar vg! Whfg unq gb xrrc svqqyvat jvgu vg hagvy lbh oebxr vg, qvqa'g lbh?!