Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!gatech!gitpyr!jkg
From: jkg@gitpyr.gatech.EDU (Jim Greenlee)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 6300 Memory upgrade
Message-ID: <2716@gitpyr.gatech.EDU>
Date: Mon, 24-Nov-86 22:42:14 EST
Article-I.D.: gitpyr.2716
Posted: Mon Nov 24 22:42:14 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Nov-86 10:17:51 EST
References: <7191@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <2681@gitpyr.gatech.EDU> <1045@ihdev.UUCP>
Reply-To: jkg@gitpyr.UUCP (Jim Greenlee)
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Lines: 31

In article <1045@ihdev.UUCP> gpw@ihdev.UUCP (G. P. Wilkin) writes:
>> In article <7191@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> gopstein@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Richard Gopstein) writes:
>> >
>> >he thinks that all of the existing chips (64K)? are soldered...
>> 
>> This is not true. There are 2 banks - one is soldered-in 64K chips...
>
>Jim, you have said is true of NEWER 6300s ONLY. The older model (CPU-3) did
>indeed have the STUPID soldered in chips. 

You should know better than I, George, but I'm curious - what vintage are the
soldered-in models? The friend that I mentioned in my previous posting bought
his in December, 1985. I don't recall exactly, but it seems like they were
practically brand new at that time. How many of these older models were sold
before AT&T wised up and put in the sockets?

                                            Jim Greenlee

(stupid blank lines so that our news system will accept this posting.
please hit 'n', or whatever, now!)






-- 
The Shadow...!{akgua,allegra,amd,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!gitpyr!jkg

Jryy, abj lbh'ir tbar naq qbar vg! Whfg unq gb xrrc svqqyvat jvgu vg hagvy lbh
oebxr vg, qvqa'g lbh?!