Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mimsy!aplcen!jhunix!ins_ammm
From: ins_ammm@jhunix.UUCP (Mamdouh Maher)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: TDK 3.5" disks -- query
Message-ID: <4026@jhunix.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Nov-86 12:13:24 EST
Article-I.D.: jhunix.4026
Posted: Tue Nov 25 12:13:24 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Nov-86 04:28:08 EST
References: <1095@spice.cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: ins_ammm@jhunix.UUCP (Mamdouh Maher)
Distribution: net
Organization: JHU
Lines: 15
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.amiga:268 comp.sys.atari.st:136 comp.sys.mac:221 comp.sys.ibm.pc:238

In article <1095@spice.cs.cmu.edu> mjp@spice.cs.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes:
 >I was wondering if any of you have had experience with TDK 3.5" DS
 >disks and can tell me if they are worthwhile in terms of quality.  I
 >know the best 3.5" disks around are Sonys, but it is possibly easier
 >and cheaper for me to go TDK.  I know that some brands should be
 >avoided like the plague (no names mentioned) and I was wondering if
 >TDK was in that category.
 >
 >Send responses via email.  I will summarize if there is enough
 >interest.

	Yes believe me there is a LOT of interest here. Please post
the summary, or E-mail me if you do not want to publicize the bad
3.5 inch disk makers. I am especially interested in the "plague" ones
because I use a wide variety of disks. Thanks a lot.