Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!styx!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!B.ISI.EDU!Info-IBMPC From: Info-IBMPC@B.ISI.EDU (Info-IBMPC Digest) Newsgroups: mod.computers.ibm-pc Subject: Info-IBMPC Digest V5 #101 Message-ID: <8611181349.AA24614@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 17-Nov-86 20:46:53 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8611181349.AA24614 Posted: Mon Nov 17 20:46:53 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 18-Nov-86 21:08:37 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: INFO-IBMPC@B.ISI.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 1148 Approved: info-ibmpc@b.isi.edu Info-IBMPC Digest Monday, 17 December 1986 Volume 5 : Issue 101 This Week's Editor: Billy Brackenridge Today's Topics: Compaq Deskpro 386 Compaq DIP Switch Ratfor from Logical Decisions Patching DOS 3.1 for COM3 Changing from DOS to XENIX NEC Floating Point Companion for V20 Available LPTX (2 Msgs.) EXTNDH.ASM Extends DOS 20 File Limit Patching Zenith's DOS 3.1 to Turn Echo Off (2 Msgs.) Hercules Bios HERCBIOS.ASM Path Bug Solution to the AT dir delay DRIVPARM in CONFIG.SYS File Compare Utility DIFF.EXE ARC and ZOO Programs - New FAST Arc/Unarc 80386 Motherboard Transplanted to AT Chassis BASIC Files Recovered under DOS 2.0 Tim Patterson now at Microsoft PCTOOLS from Central Point Software Today's Queries: Canon LBP8A1 Laser Printer Memory boards Epson FX-85 Windows Driver Wanted Fastback Competition CBASIC Compiler BITNET-3COM Gateway PC Mouse & MS Word Query ASYST / ILS for Data Acquisition & Analysis PC Hack Intermittent Memory Problems HP-150 Disk Format Detecting Printer Ready Using an Irwin 310 tape drive with a Tempest Zenith Z-150 123 EGA Driver SuperKey and Slow Screen Updates Resident Program Must Detect if COMMAND.COM is Running Writing a Book on 80386 Assembler Streaming Tape Drive ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 86 00:16:14 CST From: C321724%UMCVMB.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU (Ferrin Harrison) Subject: Compaq Deskpro 386 I found an article in "Computer Buyer's Guide and Handbook", issue Nov/Dec, page 58 on the Compaq Deskpro 386! It has a 16 MHz 80386 with socket for an 80287. 1Mb of 32-bit RAM, expandable to 10Mb without using slots, 14Mb with. 20, 40 and 130Mb disks available. There are 1 32 bit slots, 4 16/8 and 3 8s, before disks. With 40 meg, 3 16s and 3 8s, with 130, 2 16s and 3 8s. 1 to 8 Mb 32-bit memory upgrade kits cost $849 to $2999. Summary of table: Speed in MHz List Price in $ Compaq Deskpro 80386 16 4 300 -- virtual price sans disk PC's Limited /80286 16 2 995 " 12 2 695 " 10 2 295 The operating systems currently available are MS-Dos 3.x, XENIX V/286 for $599 and XENIX V/386 to be available in early 1987. My purpose in writing this is to give you some heads up time. Out of respect to the publishers, I have not given all the details on the devices and statistics, nor (I hope) have I editorialized. I am not affiliated with any of the corporations involved. I beg the pardon of the owners for the mention of various trademarks. Some addresses for the convenience of the reader: CBG&H/Back Issues Compaq Computer Corp. PO Box 318 20333 FM 149 Mt. Morris, IL 61054 0318 Houston, TX 77070 phone 800, 435 0715 or 892 0753 phone 800 231 0900 to order $5 back issues, Visa or MC You take it from there! Sincerely, Ferrin ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Nov 86 08:32 PST From: BRENGLE%OAVAX.MNET.MFENET@LLL-MFE.ARPA Subject: Compaq DIP Switch I had the same problem with the AST card. I could only get the Compaq to recognize 512K of the 640K installed. After awhile, I gave up. Then recently I sent my machine in the be fixed when the power supply went south. An alert technician not only fixed my power supply, but also noticed that my ROMs where not up to current rev. What new capability would I gain by upgrading? None other than the use of the remaining 128K. Unfortunately, I can't tell you what the upgrade costs, because I didn't pay for it. Hope this helps. ------------------------------ Date: Tue 11 Nov 86 19:29:34-PST From: Daniel Davison Subject: Ratfor from Logical Decisions About two months ago (maybe more) someone posted a note asking about Ratfor from Logical Decisions of Houston. If you would like more info (about use or otherwise) send me mail at either of the addresses below. Note: I'm a satisfied user & a friend of the author of the program. dan davison: best: bchs6@uhupvm1.bitnet, next davison@sumex-aim.arpa no uucp address, Houston's backbone node is permanently out of action ------------------------------ Date: Tuesday, 11 November 1986 22:35:26 EST From: Ralf.Brown@b.gp.cs.cmu.edu Subject: Patching DOS 3.1 for COM3 There is a quite simple way to get at COM3 from DOS, provided you are able to live with the use of only two COMx: ports at a time. This method will work for any version of DOS, as it involves fooling the ROM BIOS. The first eight bytes of the ROM BIOS data area (40:0000-40:0007) contain the base addresses of up to four COM ports. By exchanging two of the addresses, you automatically exchange the corresponding ports' numbers, i.e. if you swap the word at 40:0002 with the word at 40:0004, you swap COM2 and COM3. Now simply direct any output that was to have gone to COM3 to COM2 instead. ARPA: RALF@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU AT&T: (412) 268-3053 (school) Snail: Ralf Brown Computer Science Department Carnegie-Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 ------------------------------ From: osbook@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU (osbook) Subject: Changing from DOS to XENIX Date: 12 Nov 86 03:44:28 GMT Organization: University of California, San Diego I have been asked to show how to set up files to switch automatically between DOS and XENIX on the same machine. If you use DOS and XENIX on your machine and you find these techniques helpful, let me know via E-mail. In general, a hard disk that contains both DOS and XENIX will be partitioned into 4 partitions. 1) XENIX bad track table (very short) 2) XENIX root file system 3) XENIX usr [sic] file system 4) DOS This happens when you install XENIX. At any time, one of these partitions is "active". If partition 2 is active, Xenix will boot when you turn on the computer. If partition 4 is active, DOS will boot when you turn on the computer. You use the FDISK utility (comes with DOS and XENIX) to change the active partition. For example, if XENIX boots automatically, you can have DOS boot automatically by activating partition 4. This automatically deactivates partition 2. (Note: Some XENIX's, e.g.IBM 2.0, will let you type "DOS" and start DOS whenever XENIX is ready to boot. This will start DOS, but it will not change the active partition.) The ideal system would be to easily activate one or the other partition whenever you want; that is, to be able to change from DOS to XENIX to DOS easily. Of course, you could do it by hand, using FDISK, but this is a bad idea. First, this is not easy enough. Second, you do not want to be messing with FDISK! One false move could wipe out (re-partition) everything beyond recall. The solution is to call FDISK using a carefully designed script. Assuming that the partitions on your disk are as I described above, here is how you do it. 1) Changing from XENIX to DOS: Use the following shell script. This script feeds the correct responses to the fdisk program to activate the DOS partition. (By the way, the Xenix fdisk program is much safer than the DOS FDISK. The Xenix program will not let you cause damage.) echo echo '** Changing to DOS **' echo fdisk /dev/rhd00 <<- eof >/dev/null 2>/dev/null a 4 w q eof Note1: the line with "eof" must start at column 1. Note2: this script assumes that your hard disk is C: ("rhd00") Create this script as userid root and give it 755 permission. Say that you call it "dos" and put it in the root directory. Then, root can switch to DOS by entering: /dos A useful idea is to create the following short script: su - root -c /dos and call it "dos" and put it where everyone can get at it with permissions of 755. Then, any userid can change to DOS, if the user knows the root password. If you set this up and you are logged in under your own userid (not root) and you enter: dos you will be asked: Password: After entering the root password, your system will automatically change to DOS. 2) Changing from DOS to XENIX: Here is a batch file to change from DOS TO XENIX (the file "fdisk.xen" is explained below): :* Batch file to change to Xenix echo off :* Activate Xenix FDISK partition fdisk < fdisk.xen :* Tell user to reboot echo XENIX partition activated echo To change to XENIX, reboot system If you have a program such as "warmboot" that automatically reboots from DOS, you can reboot automatically from the batch file. Name the batch file XENIX.BAT. Then, you can change to Xenix anytime by entering: xenix The batch file works by assuming that the file FDISK.XEN contains the correct commands for FDISK. Thus, you must build such a file and make sure that it can be found by XENIX.BAT. For example, if you are keeping FDISK.XEN in the \SYSTEM\UTILITY directory, change the fourth line in the batch file to: fdisk < \system\utility\fdisk.xen To build FDISK.XEN you need to know what responses FDISK expects to change the active partition from #4 to #2. These responses are (check it yourself on your own system): 2 2 Note that there are no 's after the 's. Unfortunately, it may not be easy to create FDISK.XEN. Bear in mind, you need to generate a 8 byte file that contains the 8 bytes shown above ( takes 2 bytes). EDLIN cannot do it for you as it will not let you put in characters. Perhaps you have an editor that can do the job. If not try: 1) Do it with vi under Xenix (use Ctrl-v escape) and pass it to DOS. 2) Write a BASIC program to create the file. 3) Create a dummy file: copy con: fdisk.xen 2 2 xx then use the Norton Utilities or something to change the "xx" to two characters (hex 1B, decimal 27). This works fine. Note: When you execute XENIX.BAT and FDISK works automatically, you will hear two beeps. Don't worry, it's okay. Final Note: Usually, I suggest that people remove the FIDSK program from their hard disks. This prevents anyone else from accidentally causing catastrophic damage. However, in this case, you need FDISK. I suggest that you rename it to something else and change XENIX.BAT accordingly. ------------------------------ From: Ya'akov_Miles%UBC.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA Subject: NEC Floating Point Companion for V20 Available The NEC "PC-9801-21K" cmos replacement for the Intel 8087 is now available. The following communication was received via BITNET from a friend of mine who is working in Tokyo. PLEASE NOTE JAPANESE TRADING PRACTICES... *************************************************************************** Hi, I checked on the chip you asked about...It appears that it is now available; PC-9801-21K is an 8 MHz floating point processor which is compatible with the "V20" machine as far as I can understand. I am mailing you the NEC catalog update with suitable annotations. YOu may want to try ordering by letter or maybe I could do something from here and have it shipped to you if it is what you want. The cost is 84,000 yen (about CAN$ 700). Does it sound like what you want? Alan ************************************************************************* Alan, Please verify that price for me. I have great difficulty in believing that NEC would charge $700 (canadian) for the floating point chip when I can get an Intel 8087 for $150 - $200 (canadian), landed, with duty and federal sales tax included. Ya'akov ************************************************************************ I checked and rechecked the price. My Japanese friend assures me that the price I quoted (84000 yen) is the correct price for this chip. In Japanese it is called a "data processor" chip. Does the number I quoted your (PC....) mean anything to you? Anyway you should receive the catalogue soon and you can try to decipher it. I will continue to check to see if we have a misunderstanding. I must warn you that ONE OF THE REASONS THAT THE AMERICANS ARE SO MAD AT THE JAPS is just this. The prices internal to the country are controlled at very high levels. THE PRICES FOR EXPORT ARE SET MUCH LOWER in order to be competitive. Still the gap of $100 to $700 is more than I can believe too. A rule of thumb is to MULTIPLY BY ABOUT 2 TO 3 TIMES to get the price of anything in Japan (but of course this is not true about things like cars or I thought until now chips) Bye for now, Alan ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Nov 86 09:14 EDT From: EVERHART%ARISIA@rca.com Subject: LPTX I have had problems with LPTX under DOS 3.x also but they were readily cured. Just edit the thing to have a buffer large enough to hold at least a full page of text (2000+ chars) instead of only 512. Then the thing works reasonably well. Or at least it did for the few runs I made. Otherwise printscreen gets ROYALLY bent out of shape and you go for the big red switch... For graphics dumps you may need a still larger buffer; I haven't tried that. For text, however, the 2k buffer LPTX seems pretty solid. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 86 19:33:21 EST From: David Kirschbaum Subject: LPTX A recent posting said the user was having problems with LPTX v3.0 in DOS 3.0 (or perhaps that was DOS 3.1). I've been running LPTX v3.0 in my XT clone (640 Kb, 80286, Phoenix ROM, PC-DOS v3.1, 2 serial ports, monochrome, fairly standard setup) since it first came out, with absolutely NO problems of any sort! Exactly as advertised. Can't imagine the problem. If the user would contact me directly (well, by email, that is) with some more specifics on what's going wrong, I might be able to help. Regards, David Kirschbaum Toad Hall kirsch@braggvax.ARPA ------------------------------ Date: 12 Nov 1986 17:38:21 PST Subject: EXTNDH.ASM Extends DOS 20 File Limit From: Billy I wrote a little routine, EXTNDH.ASM, which mungs DOS to extend the file limit past the 20 files normally allowed. It uses some undocumented features of DOS, but it should run under both DOS 2.x and 3.x. It can be called from C Pascal or assembly. Thanks to Dr. Dobb's and the person who sent the anonymous note telling how to do this. Thanks also to Jeff Jacobsen for pointing out the article in May 1986 DR. Dobb's. There is an assembly time switch for Microsoft C. EXTNDH only fixes the limit in DOS. The Microsoft C run time environment also imposes a twenty file limit. As the arrays to implement this were of a fixed size, I had to redefine them to keep from clobbering neighboring variables. The Linker squawks about this, but it works fine for Microsoft C 3.0. Caveat Programmer! [EXTNDH.ASM has been added to the INFO-IBMPC lending library. -wab] ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Nov 86 09:37 EST From: Elefante@RADC-MULTICS.ARPA Subject: Patching Zenith's DOS 3.1 to Turn Echo Off Many thanks to those who offered zeroing flag byte location 1967H of COMMAND.COM to turn ECHO off for batch files. Unfortunately, my version of MSDOS (3.1 on Zenith 248) does not have the flag byte at that location. Furthermore, when I zero the value where I do believe the flag byte is located (using a procedure proposed by Ed Nather that was successful for DOS 2.xx), nothing happens. Anyway, guess I'll have to live with it for now, although begrudgingly. Don Elefante ------------------------------ Subject: Patching Zenith's DOS 3.1 to Turn Echo Off Date: Sun, 16 Nov 86 10:41:47 -0500 From: reintom@ROCKEFELLER.ARPA Don: I gave the wrong address for patching Zenith's COMMAND.COM. To turn echo off, the location in question is 1987, not 1887. Change the value from 01 to 00. Hope you and everyone on the net have not suffered any damages from my misinformation! Tom Reingold ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Nov 86 16:35:51 est From: woo@nyu-acf4.arpa (Alex C. Woo) Subject: Hercules Bios HERCBIOS.ASM The following was found on the SIMTEL20 MSDOS directories. It almost works except that most programs write directly into memory. Also I tried to define the iAPX286 without sucess on my AT-clone. Otherwise it is an informative example of programming for the Hercules graphics board. Alex. [This terminate and stay resident program adds INT 10H graphics support for the Hercules card. HERCBIOS.ASM has been added to the info-ibmpc lending library -wab] ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Nov 86 12:10:49 CST From: CCRJW%UMCVMB.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU (Richard Winkel UMC Computing Services) Subject: Path Bug Try this: Set up a path of the form 'd:..' where d is some drive spec. Get into a subdir of the root (or any level below) and issue a command which resides in the parent dir of the current dir. If the command is a batch file, it returns 'Batch File Missing'. Otherwise it returns 'Bad Command or File name'. If your path leaves off the drive spec, as in 'path ..', it works ok. A better work around is to use a path of the form 'd:.\..' ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 86 12:25:44 est From: Nathaniel Polish Cc: polish%lexington@columbia.edu Subject: Solution to the AT dir delay Well, I received about five responses to my query. I must admit that, while I appreciate all the enthusiasm, I am a bit surprised at the willingness of people to state conjecture as fact. My initial question referred to why on my configuration (PC's Limited 6/8mhz AT, Seagate 4051, PC-DOS3.0) there is always a LONG pause to get free space. Let me summarize the responses: Several people suggested that I should increase the number of buffers in CONFIG.SYS. One person mentioned that the default number of buffers is 0. This is wrong. The default varies from version to version but it is not 0. One person expressed the concern that if buffers was made big enough the dir would be cashed and not reread on diskette change. All of this is incorrect for a few reasons. Calls to DOS are file relative and allow you to ask for many sectors worth of stuff. The BIOS also has multi-sector calls. DOS, however, always asks BIOS for a single sector at a time. DOS first checks to see if the sector is in the buffers then it goes to disk. Increasing the number of buffers to a very large number is bad because DOS considers memory requests to be free and disk requests expensive. So DOS will scan all of your buffers on EVERY single sector request. This can make DOS very slow. On fast disks it pays to compute the trade-off and set buffers so that scanning the buffers costs no more than half the time to get a sector. The concern about directories being cashed despite a change in media is based on an old CPM concern. CPM kept a checksum of the dir and compared it on reads to see if the disk had changed. It turned out that there were significant odds of this failing to detect a changed disk. One person pointed me to the BIOS call which returns whether a disk had been changed. This seemed a good bet but it only works on floppies. The simplest answer was the best: DOS3.0 is simply broken. DOS3.1 exhibits none of the problems. Further, control-U is back. Case closed. Thanks for the interest. Nat Polish ARPAnet polish@columbia.edu UUCP ...seismo!columbia!polish ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 86 18:25:14 est From: nortond%csmbox@CSV.RPI.EDU (Daniel A. Norton) Subject: DRIVPARM in CONFIG.SYS Microsoft documents the config.sys command "drivparm" (note spelling) which allows you to define block-I/O device parameters. Thus, you can override some of the values which default when the system is booted. The Microsoft MS-DOS User's Reference describes the parameters in more detail. Could this be used to ease support of the increasingly popular 3-1/2" drives? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 86 19:44:23 EST From: David Kirschbaum Subject: File Compare Utility DIFF.EXE I have DIFF.EXE, that long ago I snarfed from somewhere .. I'm sure a big bulletin board like Delaware FIDO or something .. it's a 16Kb file that compares two files, and sends the differences (in a crude sort of format .. NOT like the DIF we had in CP/M) to a device (console, printer, named file). Works just fine, doesn't get TOO lost unless the differences are quite large. Problem is: The only thing in the code for credits, etc., is the version number (1.30). No name, no copyright, no public domain release. I can NOT say for sure this is in fact public domain .. so I can't distribute it. I've looked thru my catalogs of RBBSs and other goody archives .. no trace of DIFF.EXE. If anyone can recall seeing this, and CAN say it's public domain .. glad to send it to the specific requestor. I know .. no source code, so no archiving at Info-IBMPC. I won't disassemble and distribute the listing either .. same public domain question. Regards, David Kirschbaum Toad Hall kirsch@braggvax.ARPA (by the way, if anyone knows DIFF.EXE is proprietary and NOT public domain, please let me know right away! I don't want anything to do with piracy!) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1986 07:09 MST From: Keith Petersen Subject: ARC and ZOO Programs - New FAST Arc/Unarc Anyone using the ARC512 or ZOO programs for MS/PCDOS should take a serious look at PKARC. PK stands for Phil Katz, the author. He's done a SUPER job of optimizing the speed and file compression. It beats both ARC and ZOO hands down! It's the fastest ARC/UNARC program I've ever seen. The latest version is now available from SIMTEL20.ARPA as: Filename Type Bytes CRC Directory PD: PKX33A12.COM.1 BINARY 53248 E4D6H This file, when executed, extracts PKARC, PKXARC and their DOCs. Unlike ARC512 (now obsolete as far as I'm concerned), this program is FREE - no obligations. The ARCs it makes are significantly smaller than ARC512's but are still extractable under ARC512 (if you want to wait that long). This version also allows entry of comments into the ARC which can later be displayed. ARC512 will ignore them. --Keith Petersen Arpa: W8SDZ@SIMTEL20.ARPA Uucp: {bellcore,decwrl,harvard,lll-crg,ucbvax,uw-beaver}!simtel20.arpa!w8sdz GEnie Mail: W8SDZ RCP/M Royal Oak: 313-759-6569 (300, 1200, 2400 bps) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 15-Nov-86 20:28:35 edt From: David Farber Subject: 80386 Motherboard Transplanted to AT Chassis One of my IBM AT's has recently had a brain transplant. It is now equipped with an Intel 80386 motherboard. This motherboard operates at 16 MHz, with a 32-bit bus. I also have the unit equipped with a two megabyte 32-bit memory board. The motherboard went trivially and the machine came up right away. I have had no compatibility problems yet except I used to be using a new-style IBM Enhanced Keyboard designed for the XT on my AT before transplantation. The keyboard's cursor keys/numeric keypad did not work. The machine worked with the old AT keyboard and presumably would work with the AT version of the Enhanced Keyboard. I have not had a chance to run extensive benchmarks, but to date: Norton's SI (for what its worth): 18.0 (and 15.3 and 18.7) Dhrystone (registers): 2941 Dhrystone (no registers): 2631 For reference, a 0-wait state, 8 MHz A*Star does 1470 with registers and about 1360 without registers, and 7.7 for Norton's SI. Dave Farber ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 15 Nov 86 19:38:56 cet From: CHADM1%UCONNVM.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU Subject: BASIC Files Recovered under DOS 2.0 Thank you for trying to help me recover my BASIC files. It turned out that when I booted the PC with the original DOS (2.0) BASICA was able to properly load the files. I still don't know why my version of DOS (2.1) failed, but having recovered the files, I must go on to other things. Carl David ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Nov 86 17:24:19 PST From: osbook@sdcsvax.ucsd.edu (osbook) Organization: U.C. San Diego Subject: Tim Patterson now at Microsoft Several people have asked what has happened to Tim Patterson, the original author of DOS. As I understand it, Microsoft has recently hired Tim and has bought back the license that his company had to sell DOS forever. Thus, Microsoft now completely controls DOS. Harley Hahn ------------------------------ From: "Michael R. Volow" Date: 16 Nov 86 07:57:02 GMT Subject: PCTOOLS from Central Point Software Excellent selective copy, delete, move, as well as debug like facilities in commercial program PCTOOLS (Central Point Software) --Mike Volow, DukeU, Durham, NC --mvolo@ecsvax ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 8 Nov 86 20:31 EST From: LBAFRIN%clemson.csnet@RELAY.CS.NET Subject: Canon LBP8A1 Laser Printer Hello, netland. A colleague of mine is starting a research project, and with the grant he got he can afford a laser printer up to about $2500. He was looking through one of the recent issues of PC Magazine (the "we review every printer in the universe" issue) and saw an ad from Logicsoft, a big mail-order outfit, for the Canon LBP8A1 laser printer for $1985. Does anybody own (or know somebody who owns) this beast? They claim 8 ppm, but is that 8 *original* ppm? Any idea what the engine's duty cycle or MBTF is? The bottom line is, would it be a good buy for your average $2000-class laser printer? Any and all feedback (directly to me, please) will be acknowledged and greatly appreciated. -- Larry Afrin Dept. of Computer Science Clemson University ================================ Please send replies, if any, to: lbafrin@clemson.csnet or lbafrin%eureka@clemson.csnet or, as a last resort, any reasonable-looking string with "lbafrin", "eureka", and "clemson" in it (And I'm told that Usenet fans can try ihnp4!seismo!clemson.CSNET!lbafrin) I disclaim everything anybody ever said about anything. ------------------------------ Date: Mon 17 Nov 86 16:18:11-EST From: Mary Lou Frey Subject: Memory boards I am strongly considering buying the Tech Turbo PC/AT portable. It comes with 512 K RAM and runs at 10 MHz. I would like to have at least 1 M RAM which I will need to add with a board. I also need a serial connector. Anybody out there recommend a good (and cheap) memory board will a RS232C connector? Or where I might look for a review article? Also has anybody actually bought a Tech PC product? They are the only AT portable that takes a coprocessor that I have seen advertised. Otherwise the Toshiba 3100 looks mighty good. mary lou frey ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Nov 86 17:12:23 MEZ From: Rainer Kleinrensing UNI217%DBNRHRZ1.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU Subject: Epson FX-85 Windows Driver Wanted Hello! Since April 1986 I use Version 1.02 of Microsoft Windows. Apart from processing speed (on a Zenith 158 with 20MB MicroSci HD) I am quite satisfied with this program. However, the graphic print output produced on my Epson FX-85 (FX-80 driver is the only one available) from programs such as WRITE (for example Times Roman font) and PAINT is - in my opinion - not acceptable, although the printer has been installed for 'high quality' output. Does anyone out there know how to fix this problem ? If no other driver is available, I would like to write one myself, if anyone can tell me the format of those files. The Epson can produce a very high quality output and I know how to achieve this from a program I write myself. The problem is to put this into a Windows device driver file. Thank you, Rainer Kleinrensing ------------------------------ Date: Tue 11 Nov 86 11:26:53-CST From: Pete Galvin Subject: Fastback Competition Has anyone tried the new backup programs that are coming available? I've tried Fastback, but it seems to leave my system in weird states when it terminates. Are there any "nicer" backup programs out there (for hard disk to floppy backups) which are as fast or efficient? --Pete ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Nov 86 17:20:30 est From: Mike Ciaraldi To: info-ibmpc@usc-isib.arpa Subject: CBASIC Compiler Does anyone know of a BASIC compiler or interpreter for PC-DOS that is compatible with the old CBASIC compiler for CP/M? A friend is using a suite of programs in CBASIC, and wants to port them to his IBM PC. The programs are the Osborne accounting system, which is freely copyable. CBASIC is not totally compatible with Microsoft Basic, especially in the area of strings and file I/O. I seem to remember that Digital Research used to sell CBASIC for CP/M-86 (it has since been discontinued), but not for DOS. Thanks, Mike Ciaraldi ciaraldi@rochester seismo!rochester!ciaraldi ------------------------------ From: "Roger Fajman" Date: Wed, 12 Nov 86 17:51:27 EST Subject: BITNET-3COM Gateway We have an Ethernet with IBM PCs running 3COM's Ethershare and Ethermail software, with plans to go to 3-Plus. We are interested in linking the 3COM mail system to the mail system on our 3090s and to BITNET. I doubt that there is an off the shelf solution, as we run MVS/XA-JES2 on the 3090s, not VM. We also have our own mail system (including a BITNET-compatible mailer), not UCLA mail. What I would like to know is does anyone have any pieces of software that I might be able to use? Some examples would be software for the PC that constructs messages with RFC822 headers and software for the PC that would deliver messages with RFC822 and/or BSMTP headers to a 3COM mailbox. My idea for getting the mail files to and from the Ethernet is to use a PC on the Ethernet running a multileaving RJE emulation package, such as Barr HASP. Things such as DACUs and KNETs seem too expensive. Anyway, it would take a lot of persuading to get something like that hooked to our 3090's channels. Also, we already have a similar arrangement for handling mail to and from our DEC-10. Roger Fajman RAF@NIHCU.BITNET ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Nov 86 16:04:49 pst From: Gerry Key Subject: PC Mouse & MS Word Query A colleague (who is not on the net) is having problems using a Mouse Systems PC Mouse with Microsoft Word Version 3.0. I seem to recall a discussion of this problem some time ago. I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has used this combination and who can offer some pointers. Please respond directly to me and I will forward the information. Gerry Key (key@nosc.arpa) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Nov 86 09:33 EST From: Subject: ASYST / ILS for Data Acquisition & Analysis I am looking into the packages "ASYST" and "ILS" for use in a data acquisition and analysis project. I would appreciate any feedback from people who have used one or both of these software systems as to performance, things they liked, things they hated, things to watch out for, options worth buying, options that are a waste, etc. (you get the idea). These reactions would prove very helpful. Replies can be sent directly to me ( MRB @ PSUECLA --- I'm not sure of all the gateways, etc. to Penn State but we seem to be on almost all of them). If there is interest, I can try to summarize what I found out for the general readership. Thank you very much. Maurice Baker, MRB @ PSUECLA ------------------------------ Date: Thu 13 Nov 86 11:25:57-EST From: Thomas S. Wanuga Subject: PC Hack Does anyone know where i can get a copy of the latest version of PC hack, a rogue-like game for the ibm pc? Thanks. Tom Wanuga wanuga@xx.lcs.mit.edu ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Nov 86 15:12:29 EST From: Stev Knowles Subject: Intermittent Memory Problems A friend borrowed my PC to use at the start up she formed with some friends until they could get her a machine to run on. She is using it as a writers workstation, with a laserjet on COM1:. She is running Epsilon and FinalWord writing their documentation. She is writing complete docsets, and finalwording them (sorta like scribing them, I am told). Needless to say, this is probably using most of the 640K I have in the PC. This is the configuration: ibm pc, 256k motherboard, 63watt power supply. ast sixpack, 384k ibm cga everex hard disk adapter seagate st225 20 meg disk floppy controller, 1 full height ibm floppy Well, campers, it is hanging every now and then (at least once a day), I assume it is a memory error somewhere, but it passes both regular diags and advanced diags. (The reason I think it must be a memory problem is that it has parity checked a few times when she first borrowed it. but it never gave her a memory address.) I am lost now. might it be the laserjet hanging the port? is there a program out there that I could get (hopefully PD, but something like norton's utilities would be ok) that would *really* check the memory? thanks for the help. stev knowles [With a 63 Watt power supply this could be an old PC. Early PCs had 8088 processors which allowed interrupts while munging segment registers. This sometimes caused the PC to hang. This problem will show up under a heavy interrupt load such as running a laserjet via the serial port. Run the program CPUID.ASM in our library. It will tell you if you have the old 8088 chip. You can replace it with a NEC V20. If this isn't the problem, I guess you are still in the market for a worst case memory diagnostic. -wab] ------------------------------ Subject: HP-150 Disk Format Date: Fri, 14 Nov 86 09:12:43 EST From: jam@mitre-bedford.ARPA I have a need to exchange disks between an IBM Convertible and an HP-150. Does anyone know of a program for formatting, writing and reading disks on the Convertible for use on the HP-150? Manzana sells a 3 1/2" drive for PC's with software which can handle the HP format. They said that the software would run directly on the Convertible, but they don't sell it without the hardware. However, they claim that what I want done is possible in software. Thanks for any help. Joshua Morris jam@mitre-bedford ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 86 16:01:11 MEZ From: A4422DAB%AWIUNI11.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU Subject: Detecting Printer Ready Does anybody out there know a way to find out if a printer is connected and ready? The MS-DOS interface only can correctly determine that if a printer is connected, but there is no way to find out that no printer is connected to the PC. Perhaps the information has already been published, but I am relatively new to this discussion group. Thanks Erich Neuwirth ------------------------------ From: thode@nprdc.arpa (Walt Thode) Date: 14 November 1986 1353-PST (Friday) Subject: Using an Irwin 310 tape drive with a Tempest Zenith Z-150 We recently obtained an Irwin 310 Tape backup for use with our IBM-XTs and compatibles. It seems to work fine with our XTs, but the 37-pin (DP-37) male connector on the cable from the Irwin doesn't match the similarly sized but different hard disk interface plug, which is female but which is set up for three rows of 62 pins instead of the two rows on the Irwin's DP-37 plug. We need some sort of converter to make the connection with the Z-150. The Zenith documentation does little more than recognize that a hard disk controller card is an option on the Z-150s. Any assistance in finding a way to use our Irwin with our Z-150s, either in the form of a jumper cable between the two (which we could construct if we knew how to hook it up) or any other solutions to our problem, would be appreciated. --Walt Thode (thode@nprdc) ------------------------------ Date: Sat 15 Nov 86 01:15:54-PST From: Carl Fussell Subject: 123 EGA Driver About a month ago a notice was posted to this list about an EGA driver for Lotus 123 (Ver 1a) that was available on a Boston BBS. I have tried on several occasions to dial that BBS with no success. I was wondering if anyone knows if this is available from some other source? Thanks in advance for any help... Carl Fussell Carl%scu%panda@sumex-aim.arpa ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 15 Nov 86 21:32:13 est From: Peter Marshall Subject: SuperKey and Slow Screen Updates I have become aware recently that the (monochrome) screen on my 8MHz Zenith-158 running Kermit 2.29a was really getting behind especially when I was making a connection at 19.2k to our VAX. The file transfers run at a reasonable 800+ cps, but the screen was being painted at about 400 cps. A very dumb and old terminal in my office can do much better than that. The MS-DOS type command shows similar performance. Removing some memory resident utilities (SideKick, Outline!) got me back a few cps, but the big gain was when I removed SuperKey. Suddenly I was getting well over 650 cps (with the burst speed almost keeping up with a 9600 bps line). I've really grown accustomed to SuperKey (although it is a bit of a memory hog for my use). Can anyone tell me why that program is slowing me down so much? Is this a known problem with a particular version of the program (mine is v1.03)? Why even with a bare system is the screen so slow? Peter Marshall. (also A111.UWOCC1.BITNET) ------------------------------ Date: 16 NOV 86 19:54-EST From: 89RBW%WILLIAMS.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU Subject: Resident Program Must Detect if COMMAND.COM is Running Does any one know how to determine if an application program is running, or if just DOS's COMMAND when a resident program is activated? If I have a resident program that is called from an event, how can I tell if it is safe to do certain activities. I know about INT 28H, but that only tells you if disk operation is safe at the moment. I am writing a resident module that might have to load a large overlay to perform certain duties, and I only want that to happen when there is no program running but COMMAND. Thanks, -Richard Ward ( 89RBW @ WILLIAMS.BITNET ) ( 89RBW%WILLIAMS.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.ARPA ) [The file INDOS.TXT is related to this topic but not the complete answer. -wab] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Nov 86 19:04:26 PST From: osbook@sdcsvax.ucsd.edu (osbook) Subject: Writing a Book on 80386 Assembler I need your help. I will soon be starting work on a new book, dealing with assembly language programming for the new Intel 80386. If you have any ideas about which topics YOU would like to see in an assembly language book, please let me know. The book will be for people who already know how to program but who may never have programmed before in assembly language. If you send in a suggestion that I use, I will be glad to acknowledge you in the book. If you would like to be acknowledged, please include your name and affiliation. Also, I have a book coming out late this month (November) called: The Complete Guide to IBM PC AT Assembly Language published by Scott Foresman and Company (B Daltons can get it for you) I will be pleased to receive any comments that anyone would care to make on this book. Thanks, Harley Hahn ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Nov 86 21:52:23 EST From: Joe Herman Subject: Streaming Tape Drive We recently acquired an IBM 6157 streaming tape drive. However the software the comes with it does not support the IBM PC Network. So....does anyone know of any third party that would supply software that will backup over the network? Much obliged, Joe Herman University of Maryland Chocolate Research Team DZOEY@UMD5.UMD.EDU seismo!umd5.umd.edu!dzoey ------------------------------ End of Info-IBMPC Digest ************************ -------