Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!XEROX.COM!Leisner.Henr
From: Leisner.Henr@XEROX.COM (marty)
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: Re: VAX C bug
Message-ID: <861101-142926-3668@Xerox>
Date: Sat, 1-Nov-86 17:29:20 EST
Article-I.D.: Xerox.861101-142926-3668
Posted: Sat Nov  1 17:29:20 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 4-Nov-86 00:01:21 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 11
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa

Gary,

I don't use the VAX C compiler, but this seems reasonable, knowing about
early implementations of C allowed =<operator> instead of <operator>=.

Also it is better style to seperate variables off operators by a space.

If you want, I could try the sample you sent on a variety of C compilers
I use.

marty