Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!rutgers!clyde!cuae2!ihnp4!ucbvax!XX.LCS.MIT.EDU!JNC From: JNC@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU ("J. Noel Chiappa") Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: EGP madness Message-ID: <12254973360.67.JNC@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU> Date: Fri, 14-Nov-86 19:19:15 EST Article-I.D.: XX.12254973360.67.JNC Posted: Fri Nov 14 19:19:15 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 16-Nov-86 00:45:13 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 40 Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa Hi. This is a canned message. My apologies for not sending a personalized reply, but this question gets asked once a month and I got tired of typing the same message. (An MIT hacker defined 'Hell' as 'answering the same bug report over and over again'.) It was answered most recently on: Fri 3 Oct 86 01:48:28-EDT Fri 31 Oct 86 16:03:42-EST You have asked a question about the infamous 'extra hop problem'. The problem is not caused by EGP, which is telling you exactly what the gateway you are a neighbour with is doing itself with packets to given destinations, but the routing protocol (GGP) which is used by the core gateways among themselves. It predates EGP, was not designed with the pattern of information flows that you see in EGP in mind, and is the cause of the problem. As a brief example of the problem, if MIT has core gateway A as an EGP peer, and Berkeley has a peer core gateway B, then there is no way (using GGP) for A to inform B that to get to MIT it can go direct; both B and all its clients (e.g. Berkeley) think they have to go through A. This is the cause of the funny routes to places you ought to be able to get to directly, etc. Your gateway is just fine, and it's not EGP's fault either. The extra hop problem will only be solved when GGP is retired; i.e. when the PDP11 core gateways are replaced by Butterflys, probably. When GGP is replaced the problem will magically disappear without any changes to EGP. For a more detailed explanation of the problem, look in the TCP-IP archive for a message I sent out at Thu 6 Mar 86 18:16:01-EST which goes into great detail. (No, I do not know how to access the TCP-IP archives, so don't send me mail asking for it; I'll ignore your message. If someone from the NIC sends me the appropriate info, I'll happily insert it here.) Just out of interest, were you on TCP-IP then? Noel -------