Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!unirot!gib
From: gib@unirot.UUCP (gib wallis)
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari16
Subject: MT Micro C Shell vs. OS9 for ST
Message-ID: <120@unirot.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Nov-86 17:33:35 EST
Article-I.D.: unirot.120
Posted: Wed Nov  5 17:33:35 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 5-Nov-86 22:46:35 EST
Expires: Mon, 1-Dec-86 00:00:00 EST
Reply-To: gib@unirot.UUCP (gib wallis)
Distribution: net.micro.atari16 comp.sys.atari.16
Organization: Public Access Un*x (The Soup Kitchen) NJ
Lines: 20
Keywords: Which is better in your opinion?

Recently I have been debating whether or not I should purchase MT Micro C Shell
or OS9. Both are said to have the feel of UNIX, both are said to have
multi-tasking and multi-user capabilities, both of which I highly desire for my Atari ST [it would make me use my Macintosh less, but I'd be willing to pay the price!]

How many of you netters have had experience with either or both OS9 for the
Atari ST, and MT Micro C Shell? I probably would have make a hasty decision
long ago if either were readily available in the beautiful Land Of UM
[Upper Montclair, NJ for those of you not in the know]

Please reply via email and if there is enough interest, I will post my
findings to the net.

ciao for now,
     gib


-- 
..!rutgers!unirot!gib
OR gib@unirot.UUCP
"Power can command wealth, but wealth can't always command power."