Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-crg!styx!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU!jordan
From: jordan@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.misc
Subject: Re: Abuses of the net
Message-ID: <16450@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Sun, 23-Nov-86 21:22:47 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.16450
Posted: Sun Nov 23 21:22:47 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Nov-86 04:29:01 EST
References: <6555@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: jordan@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (Jordan Hayes)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 12
Summary: I'm confused ...
Xref: watmath news.admin:33 news.misc:66

Brian Reid <reid@decwrl.UUCP> writes:

	I must say that I am also appalled. Everyone knows that
	"shit-for-brains" is an adjective, and so the sentence "You
	have shit-for-brains" is grammatically incorrect. The correct
	way to say it is to leave the hyphens out: "You have shit for
	brains".

What's the difference between "You have shit for brains" and "You don't
have shit for brains" ...? I'm not sure ... *ugh*

/jordan