Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!krs
From: krs@astroatc.UUCP
Newsgroups: sci.bio,talk.origins
Subject: Re: Evolution vs.(?) Creationism
Message-ID: <634@astroatc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Dec-86 09:21:06 EST
Article-I.D.: astroatc.634
Posted: Wed Dec 10 09:21:06 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 14-Dec-86 02:03:22 EST
References: <2778@gitpyr.gatech.EDU> <1260@cybvax0.UUCP>
Reply-To: krs@astroatc.UUCP (Keith R. Scidmore)
Organization: Astronautics ATC, Madison, WI
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath sci.bio:45 talk.origins:227

In article <1260@cybvax0.UUCP> mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) writes:
>Followups to sci.bio and talk.origins (definitely not the kids newsgroups!)
>
>In article <2778@gitpyr.gatech.EDU> dts@gitpyr.UUCP (Danny Sharpe) writes:
...
>
>Yes, this is a good example of selection.
>
>> These are all examples of natural selection at work.
>
>Neither of these is natural selection, in that the selection pressures are
>being applied by man.

So what?  The mechanism is the thing in question, not the cause of the
evolutionary pressure.  That man can reproduce the result is proof
of the theory.