Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!clyde!cbatt!ukma!ukecc!vnend
From: vnend@ukecc.UUCP (D. W. James)
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: This is *stupid*
Message-ID: <870@ukecc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Dec-86 20:09:22 EST
Article-I.D.: ukecc.870
Posted: Thu Dec  4 20:09:22 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Dec-86 20:51:25 EST
References: <12246@watnot.UUCP>
Reply-To: vnend@ukecc.UUCP (D. W. James)
Distribution: net
Organization: Univ. of KY Engineering Computing Center
Lines: 27
Summary: But I thought...

In article <12246@watnot.UUCP> ccplumb@watnot.UUCP (Colin Plumb) writes:
>The following is excerpted from the January, 1987 issue of
>_Radio-Electronics_, and as an example of the U.S. government's
>bass-ackward approach to secrecy, I feel this is almost unparalelled.
>
>--- Excerpt begins ---
>
>  _Videocipher_II_ is protected by numerous U.S. laws.  It uses the
>DES encryption system that, until April 22, 1987, may be protected
>from unauthorized busting by the National Security Agency.  NSA is
>responsible for the security and integrity of the DES code, and uses
>it to transmit less-than-top-secret messages to military and embassy
>locations world-wide.  In the M/A-Com view, anyone who tampers with
>DES or attempts to profit from decoding it is guilty of treason
>against the U.S. government.  Obviously, charges of treason are not to
>be taken lightly.

	Just a question (point?). I thought that charges of treason were
only valid during wartime and that during peacetime some other charge
(whose name escapes me) applies. Anybody out there clear on this point?


-- 
*******************************************************************************
Later y'all,             Vnend            Ignorance is the Mother of Adventure.
**UUCP:cbosgd!ukma!ukecc!vnend;                CSNET:vnend@ecc.engr.uky.csnet**
************BITNET:cn0001dj@ukcc.BITNET (but only as a last resort)************