Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!esquire!caggiano
From: caggiano@esquire.UUCP (Frank Caggiano)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Launching shuttles soon
Message-ID: <16@esquire.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Nov-86 20:12:16 EST
Article-I.D.: esquire.16
Posted: Thu Nov 13 20:12:16 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Nov-86 01:52:45 EST
References: <7254@utzoo.UUCP> <346@xios.UUCP> <7275@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: caggiano@esquire.UUCP (Frank Caggiano)
Organization: DP&W, New York, NY
Lines: 12

In article <260@cartan.Berkeley.EDU> desj@brahms (David desJardins) writes:

>I think that any person who is
>knowledgeable about the shuttle would agree that if the shuttle were to be
>launched immediately, with simple precautions (e.g., not launching in arctic
>weather!), that the risk of loss due to SSME malfunction would be substan-
>tially than the risk of SRB failure.

I never relized that the weather in Florida during January was considered
arctic. I always wondered why so many people went there on vacation :-)

Frank Caggiano