Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsri!utegc!utai!ubc-vision!ubc-cs!andrews From: andrews@ubc-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: can.politics Subject: Re: 'Free' Trade? Message-ID: <827@ubc-cs.UUCP> Date: Tue, 10-Feb-87 13:38:05 EST Article-I.D.: ubc-cs.827 Posted: Tue Feb 10 13:38:05 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 10-Feb-87 19:36:07 EST References: <12419@watnot.UUCP> <1469@hcrvx1.UUCP> Reply-To: andrews@ubc-cs.UUCP (Jamie Andrews) Distribution: can Organization: UBC Department of Computer Science, Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 31 In article <1469@hcrvx1.UUCP> chrisr@hcrvx1.UUCP (Chris Retterath) writes: > ... However, the American South, >and the North-west, and New England, all have a unique culture. These things >have all developed within a union of states. You seem to be presuming that >Canadian culture is weaker then these, a presumption I would challenge. The difference is that all the regions of the U.S. are represented and recognized in the popular culture, whereas most Americans think of Canada as "that place where our winter storms come from". Opening up Canada to the American media would mean opening up Canada to a view of the world in which America is disproportionately more important than Canada. America has vastly superior media resources, and can roll over Canadian culture like a steamroller over a cream puff. I will believe the American media can use its resources in a manner not detrimental to Canada when the American TV networks start situating 10% of (say) their sit-coms in Canada, to reflect the Canadian 10% of their potential market. However, that'll be the day, as Buddy Holly said, when I die. >As for Americans buying out Canadian culture, don't hold your breath. Exactly. Why do that when they can simply up the power on their transmitting stations and widen the distribution of their magazines, and rake in all sorts of extra profit without having to cater to their new market? --Jamie. ...!ubc-vision!ubc-cs!andrews "Take my shoes off & throw them in the lake"