Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!labrea!glacier!jbn
From: jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.sys.m68k
Subject: Re: byte order: be reasonable - do it my way...
Message-ID: <14542@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: Sat, 17-Jan-87 03:38:34 EST
Article-I.D.: glacier.14542
Posted: Sat Jan 17 03:38:34 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 19-Jan-87 04:08:31 EST
References: <760@orcisi.UUCP> <1011@cuuxb.UUCP> <753@vaxb.calgary.UUCP> <183@pembina.alberta.UUCP> <980@gould9.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbn@glacier.UUCP (John B. Nagle)
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 5
Keywords: This is a problem in the network world as well.  The IP/TCP world is
Xref: mnetor comp.arch:201 comp.sys.m68k:119

big-endian, but TP4/MAP is little-endian. 
      Incidentally, there are some fields in X.25 control frames where the
BITS are in reverse order, for obscure historical reasons.

					John Nagle