Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!nbires!vianet!devine
From: devine@vianet.UUCP (Bob Devine)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.4bsd
Subject: Re: bug in cal (1) - actually feature
Message-ID: <127@vianet.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Jan-87 14:36:03 EST
Article-I.D.: vianet.127
Posted: Wed Jan 21 14:36:03 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Jan-87 02:52:48 EST
References: <2265@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Organization: ViaNetix  Boulder, CO
Lines: 13
Summary: pointer to mod.sources submission

In article <2265@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>, oster@lapis.berkeley.edu (David Phillip Oster) writes:
> By the way,
> it is an interesting question what cal should do if you ask for a year
> before 1752. Different calendars were adopted in different places at
> different times. 
> 
> Anybody have any good references for early calendars?

  Now that mod.sources has started to spout forth articles again,
you can check for my submission that deals with early calendars
from different countries.

Bob Devine