Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watcgl!sjrapaport
From: sjrapaport@watcgl.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: CRT technology?
Message-ID: <380@watcgl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-Jan-87 00:21:42 EST
Article-I.D.: watcgl.380
Posted: Fri Jan 16 00:21:42 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 16-Jan-87 07:29:40 EST
References: <1219@ucbcad.berkeley.edu> <2138@calmasd.CALMA.UUCP>
Reply-To: sjrapaport@watcgl.UUCP (Steve Rapaport)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 15

In article <1219@ucbcad.berkeley.edu>, faustus@ucbcad.berkeley.edu (Wayne A. Christopher) writes:
> How about LCD displays?  Is
> there any theoretical reason for LCD's to be more or less suitable than
> [CRT's?]

Just a personal opinion.  Sorry to all the excellent CRT manufacturers out
there, along with the electroluminescent and plasma guys, but I'm just
tapping my fingers waiting until we get some decent fast LCD's.  Glowing
screens bug my eyes.  Eyestrain is nothing compared to the horror of
going to bed after a prolonged hacking session with visions of glowing
dot-matrix characters dancing in your head....

-steve@watcomputer
"If it glistens, gobble it!"  -zippy the pinhead.
"If it glows, smash it."      -me