Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cuae2!ihnp4!ihlpg!foss
From: foss@ihlpg.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C Review
Message-ID: <2728@ihlpg.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Jan-87 09:12:33 EST
Article-I.D.: ihlpg.2728
Posted: Thu Jan 15 09:12:33 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 16-Jan-87 07:26:50 EST
References: <2313@brl-adm.ARPA>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 36

: I am currently finishing up a new text book on C with a colleague
: of mine and we just received the last of several technical reviews.
: This particular reviewer makes some statements that we find hard
: to accept. However, we're just two people, so we decided to get
: some opinions from other C programmers. Below is a list of some
: his statements. Is this guy for real? Your comments would be
: greatly appreciated. Incidentally, the text is not an intro
: text, it assumes the reader has finished a course in Pascal.
: 
: "... 95% of all C programmers couldn't give you a good
: explanation of the term lvalue..."
: 
: "... Switch/case could be classified as rarely used and should be
: kept till later.
: 
: "... very few C programmers know much about sizeof..."
: 
: "... 99%  of  all  professional C  programmers  have no idea
: what typedef is all about, couldn't care less and probably
: won't ever need it."
: 
: "... 99%  of  all  professional C  programmers  have no idea
: what the comma operator is all about, couldn't care less and
: probably won't ever need it."
: 
: "... Leave the comma operator altogether. An intro book is no
: place for obscure and unmaintainable tricks..."
: 
: "... Pointers to functions ... few C programmers understand
: them or would ever need them..."
: 
: "... a C programmer never needs to know what a byte is..."

I think your reviewer likes to think that he/she is in the vast
majority of C programmers.  In fact, he/she is in a very sad
minority and is not qualified to read your *NON* intro textbook.