Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!cae780!amdcad!sun!gorodish!guy
From: guy@gorodish.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Time for 64-bit longs?
Message-ID: <12441@sun.uucp>
Date: Fri, 30-Jan-87 15:34:03 EST
Article-I.D.: sun.12441
Posted: Fri Jan 30 15:34:03 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Jan-87 09:24:03 EST
References: <848@epimass.UUCP> <260@vax1.ccs.cornell.edu>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Reply-To: guy@sun.UUCP (Guy Harris)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 4
Xref: watmath comp.lang.c:892 comp.unix.wizards:762

>And will the future 128-byte pointer be a "long long long" ? 

Absolutely NOT.  A "long long long (int)" will be an integral type;
pointer types are not the same as integral types.