Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcnc!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: assembly programming prefereable to HLL programming ?
Message-ID: <1940@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Jan-87 20:35:57 EST
Article-I.D.: mmintl.1940
Posted: Mon Jan 19 20:35:57 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Jan-87 22:27:46 EST
References: <646@instable.UUCP> <476@atari.UUcp> <384@unc.unc.UUCP> <12037@cca.CCA.COM>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT
Lines: 11

In article <12037@cca.CCA.COM> bills@CCA.UUCP (Bill Stackhouse) writes:
>Compiler technology should allow all HLLs to have an optimizer that
>can be used just prior to shipping a piece of code to make the
>result equal to or better than and coded assembler.

Better make that just prior to final testing.  Better yet, use the optimizer
throughout the development process.  Changing the code generator creates/
uncovers new bugs.

Frank Adams                           ihnp4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
Multimate International    52 Oakland Ave North    E. Hartford, CT 06108