Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cbmvax!grr
From: grr@cbmvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: another reason not to route uucp ! format paths
Message-ID: <1306@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 28-Jan-87 17:40:51 EST
Article-I.D.: cbmvax.1306
Posted: Wed Jan 28 17:40:51 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Jan-87 02:01:37 EST
References: <14396@amdcad.UUCP> <613@cdx39.UUCP> <2576@phri.UUCP> <14481@amdcad.UUCP> <1300@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <14511@amdcad.UUCP>
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 25
Xref: watmath comp.mail.headers:115 comp.mail.uucp:193

In article <14511@amdcad.UUCP> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes:
>>
>>True, but this already a fatal problem in the real world.  There are
>>unmarked anti-social routers out there that are diverting any external
>>mail to your neptune to the other...
>
>You make it sound as though "well, people are doing this (wrong) thing
>already, so what are you complaining about?"
>
>I'm sure that isn't what you meant.
>
> Phil Ngai +1 408 982 7840

Silly me - I was just trying to say that there is nothing theoretical
or future tense about the duplicate name / auto re-routing problem.

One can either start a campaign to make these rerouters correct the
errors of their ways, or one can correct the duplicate name situation.

Which solution do you have more control over?

-- 
George Robbins - now working for,	uucp: {ihnp4|seismo|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing	arpa: cbmvax!grr@seismo.css.GOV
Commodore, Engineering Department	fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)